we see it with podesta and huma abedin. they continue to tell us one thing and have a second set of rules for themselves. this pattern of destruction of lying continues with the clintons. and if you look, we ve seen it for 30 years, the zebra is not going to change its stripes. this is what we can expect out of a clinton presidency. one set of rule for them, one set for us, one pattern of telling us one thing, doing another. hey, sean it s happened for 30 years. it s not going to change. on the related i think subject of this comey letter that was released yesterday, i want to understand score something because i ve read it and seen it and heard it mischaracterized in the media. there s no reopening that has taken place of the hillary clinton investigation. what i glean from the comey letter is that new information has come to the fbi and they feel obliged to take a look at it. what he s saying beyond that, i really don t know. i mean, the final paragraph i ll put it up on
that means when you act in such a way that you knew or should have known that it s so grossly obvious that what you said and what you did is so opposite from each other that under the law you in effect intentionally lied to the american people. he s constantly saying one thing, doing another. you brought up the inequality. this president is the king of income inequality. if you like your plan you can keep it. i estimate american enterprise, manhattan institute and others that studied. experts say it will be over a hundred million americans in the end that will lose their plan. can t keep the plan. many can t keep their doctor. you won t save $2500 per family per year. most americans see dramatic rate increases. the next step here, you don t have the senate or the white
gross negligence. that means when you act in such a way that you knew or should have known that it s so grossly obvious that what you said and what you did is so opposite from each other that under the law you in effect intentionally lied to the american people. he s constantly saying one thing, doing another. you brought up the inequality. this president is the king of income inequality. if you like your plan you can keep it. i estimate american enterprise, manhattan institute and others that studied. experts say it will be over a hundred million americans in the end that will lose their plan. can t keep the plan. many can t keep their doctor. you won t save $2500 per family per year. most americans see dramatic rate increases. the next step here, you don t
let s go out front. i m erin burnett. breaking news, federal failure. gridlock reigns in washington once again. the payroll tax cut proposal passes the republican house. so why do we say failure? well, the republican bill included a controversial oil pipeline that the president has said he would veto. so pass, smash. we re at square one with congress playing chicken with the clock. there are just 18 days left until the tax cut expires. if it does, the average american will pay about a thousand dollars more in taxes next year. now, this may not be economic armageddon. but because the tax cut is popular for everyone, both parties want to pass it. so why are they failing? the bottom line, in one afternoon we found a way to compromise and get this done with the help of robert and williams at the nonpartisan tax policy center. here goes, what we call a decent proposal. if you extended the payroll tax cut for only people making under $75,000 a year, the price tag would be about $
reporters in the room smelled blood. going through this bill, there s earmark after earmark from the both of you, millions of dollars in earmarks from the two of you and from other senators. how do you have any credibility on this? why do you have earmarks in here? because we re going to vote against the bill. let me just senator, would you admit it s awkward for you to be standing here and advocating for stripping these out when you both have requested them. i mean, it appears like you re saying one thing, doing another. senator, were you wrong when you put these earmarks in? karl, this is not just about earmarks. we voted if for an earmark moratorium. we will abide by that, and we will reject any earmarks requested by us or anyone else, because that s what the american people told us they want. thank you, guys. thank you very much. is that an acknowledgement that it was wrong to put the earmarks in in the first place. that s my question. you ve asked the question