maefrd in the eyes of the government of the united states as of today. i would have gone further than the decision today. i think the 14th amendment to the constitution could not be more clear, nor shall any state deprive any person of life liberty or property without due process of life nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. tell me how a state can deny a couple that right to marry without denying liberty? and how can a state be allowed the couple without due process of law? did they commit a crime. i heard doifd boyce say something outside the supreme court today. he said the decision by the court today striking down doa, against of marriage act will be followed by the same decision against california s prop 8 when that measure gets to be properly brought before the court which it hasn t so far. i agree with david as i often do. the wheels of justice turn slowly but they will some day and they will some day grind