that the district attorney likely errored in exercising its jurisdiction to enjoin the u.s. use of the classified records in its criminal investigation. we agree. and there s more. the three-judge panel tears to shreds the arguments that trump and his lawyers have been making in public and in the court of law, that the records belong to him, or that somehow, at some unknown and unstated point in time, that he declassified the documents. also, from the ruling, quote, plaintiff, meaning donald trump, has not even attempted to show that he has a need to know the information contained in the classified documents. the plaintiff suggests that he may have declassified these documents when he was president. but the record contains no evidence that any of these records were declassified. in any event, at least for these purposes, the declassification argument is a red herring, because declassifying an official document would not change its content or render it personal. so even if we
far more conservative than susan collins reject the current position. i hope this is a political tsunami for republicans. i suspect a dog pop the car. two presidents got where america s head was on abortion. george h.w. bush said we ll always have exception for rape, incest, life of the mother. and bill clinton said wants abortion to be safe, legal, and rare. that is sort of where americans are across the party lines. nobody is out cheerleading abortion. it s not fun or exciting. nobody loves the fact it s there. they don t want someone to be denied income a child is ten years old and raped, it s outrageous, insane. and they re going to pay a political price for this. we ve seen a lot of movement and voter registration, women registered to vote at number way out the normal predicted numbers. i suggestion inspect that we re going to see even more impact of this. if not a political tsunami, it s
It's time to break out those costumes, Houston. Halloween is here and myriad events and spectacles are vying for your patronage. From haunted houses to p
things you thought he should say before the speech. what is it that you found unacceptable to you as someone in the president s base? all i m saying is, there s synagogue here that have if you look at infrastructure which he barely touched. he barely touched infrastructure. he talks about aids. look, i i helped write the global aids proposal in pepfar. so all in. it s not something conservatives are going to be cheering about tomorrow. i m just saying, if you look at what the president the concrete proposals he put forward, there is not a lot of conservative there s about nancy pelosi democrats. i see it very, very differently. i saw this as a psychotically incoherent speech with cookies and dog pop. he tries to put together in the same speech these warm kind things about humanitarianism and caring about children. at the same time, he is demonizing people who are immigrants in a way that was appalling. demonizing child
conservative what were you cheering, that s what i m interested in? a lot of the things he said were things you thought he should say before the speech. what is it that you found unacceptable to you as someone in the president s base? all i m saying is, there s synagogue here that have if you look at infrastructure which he barely touched. he barely touched infrastructure. he talks about aids. look, i i helped write the global aids proposal in pepfar. so all in. it s not something conservatives are going to be cheering about tomorrow. i m just saying, if you look at what the president the concrete proposals he put forward, there is not a lot of conservative there s about nancy pelosi democrats. i see it very, very differently. i saw this as a psychotically incoherent speech with cookies and dog pop. he tries to put together in the same speech these warm kind things about humanitarianism and caring about children.