he seems to be but it is unclear, the causal relationship is, there are no facts. he didn t talk about a specific policy in point of fact. he talks about this vague impression he has of dog don mike donald trump. doesn t mention the fact that donald trump is responsible, and my judgment, for $2.9 trillion in appreciation in the stock market since election day. that is a pretty strong statement. it is not picking winners and losers. it is making winners of everyone investing. bill: he doesn t like the trade deals, you think there will be a trade war. he calls a protectionism, to be rational, to insist that the drug trade deals, as the president said, be reciprocal, be mutual, be fair, rather than free. bill: do you think if there is any validity related duty ts argument? i think it seems to be absolute animus. he is speaking as if they are they are archrivals, that this