Course if you show up for their deportation or immigration hearing. So at the start of the Trump Administration lost Immigrant Kids, they didnt lose anybody. When hhs tried to check up on these kids with their sponsors, at times, illegal immigrant families themselves caring for the children, 1475 failed to take the calls or even respond to the government at all. So the Immigrant Kids arent lost. Their sponsors just havent connected with the hhs, or made themselves available. But the media want to misconstrue that as losing a kid, okay. Lets do that for a moment. Hypothetically lets just say that thats correct. Obama lost nearly three times the number of kids, the New York Times reporting a 2016 Inspector General report show that the federal government was able to reach only 84 of
children it had placed leaving 4,159 undercounted 4,159 unaccounted for. Correct me if im wrong, i dont remember any Media Lashing out at obama for losing kids or separating them from their families. In fact,
who said they weren t crazy about this guy because he essentially countenanced the dismemberment of their country by russia. but that s a lot different than the campaign that the russians undertook. no top-down effort. no systematic effort by the ukrainian government to attack the united states election. such a big difference there, senator. thank you for helping us understand what that difference is. you also have an op-ed in usa today which quotes a sherlock holmes story about the dog that didn t bark. explain to me what you mean by that. i love that s one of my favorite sherlock holmes stories. there was a crime committed at a farm house. sherlock holmes visited. the dog in the barn barked like crazy and then they determined the night of the crime, the dog didn t bark which holmes deduced meant the crime was an inside job. the dog knew who the intruder was. the dog that s not barking in this case are the major figures in the trump administration that could set this matter to
campaign 2015-16. the fbi should look at people like that but they are not investigating the campaign. so you are saying president trump was wrong? i have seen no evidence that those people were part of an investigation on the campaign. laura: your reaction? his final statement might be true. he may have seen no evidence of any spying on the trump campaign. it doesn t mean it didn t happen. i think it s very difficult to prove that a dog didn t bark. i don t think he saying he didn t laura: you ve got rubio, we will play a sound bite later on from trey gowdy. there are a lot of republicans who seem to be working overtime. a lot of them didn t support the president, working overtime to build a bob mueller, the mueller team. i think from the very beginning there have been a lot of people go up in surprise. great to see you as always. congrats on the book. great read as always. andy mccarthy is here next to
2015-2016. the fbi should look at people like that but they are not investigating the campaign. they re investigating those people. so you are saying president trump was wrong? i have seen no evidence that those people were part of an investigation on the campaign. laura: your reaction? his final statement might be true. he may have seen no evidence of any spying on the trump campaign. it doesn t mean it didn t happen. i think it s very difficult to prove that a dog didn t bark. i don t think he saying he didn t laura: you ve got rubio, we will play a sound bite later on from trey gowdy. there are a lot of republicans who seem to be working overtime. a lot of them didn t support the president, working overtime to build a bob mueller, the mueller team. i think from the very beginning there have been a lot of people go up in surprise. great to see you as always. congrats on the book. great read as always. andy mccarthy is here next to tell us why there is now no doubt that te
manifests itself, when people see in their paychecks we saw in pennsylvania 2018, the dog didn t bark. that s why at the end, saccone, the republican candidate moved to they re coming for your bibles. he thought that would work instead. that has to be terrifying to a lot of swing districts. if i were a district that i won, a republican candidate won narrowly in 2016, the paa 18 thing is the equivalent of watching the rivers turn to blood. you d think about bailing? pretty hard. what do you have, taxes, taxes, taxes? that that s it? he a that s what you talked about eliana. where is the agenda? i don t think there is one between now and the november elections which makes it difficult for the republicans. the problem they face is they didn t pass a reconciliation bill. which means they need 60 votes to get anything through the senate. frankly the house, anything that passes the republican house is