he heard, and disinvited trump to an event that was supposed to happen saturday. the washington post aired a taping from donald trump in 2005 of t . and in it he was heard he tried to date married women and grabbed their genitals without complaint. his apology didn t directly address the comments. he went on the attack, mentioning bill clinton s scandal. earlier, my colleague, brianna keilar weighed in on it. this does go farther than anything we heard donald trump say in terms of what is considered socially acceptable behavior speech. he has dismissed some of his past comments about women saying you know what, that was entertainment. no one respects women pomore th
i would sway thay this, of t so-called conventional politicians, christie is having a pretty good night. i get the sense that he s effective but even though he s effective, people don t necessarily want to consider him as president. but i think compared again, compared to walker, compared to bush, compared to rubio, compared to rand paul, he was in the game there tonight. who had the best night, from your perspective? i think you d have to say of the nontrump candidates, i think you d have to say carly fiorina did. she s got some effective lines. she s also because i ve interviewed her. she s very well informed. i would use the word she s very precise. i would assume, i m guessing, that she s diligent in terms of preparation and understanding and briefing. and she does her homework. i think she s actually got quite a nimble mind. so she doesn t retreat. she did a couple of her well
that s 5 points hyperthan where ted krutz cruz is now. i m not sure what herman kane does for a living right now. but i know he ain t president of t the united states. and ted cruz is never going to be president either. the american dream is of a better future, a confident retirement. those dreams, there s just no way we re going to let them die.
well, they will say much worse, but if all the people we ve been talking about as potential candidates, paul ryan is the one that has a legitimate claim to run. he s young, very smart, has his budget plan that s been passed twice and ignored an equal number of times. and derided by virtually every economist who says the math doesn t add up but now he s going to reduce the deficit and achievements not in 30 but in 10 careers but carry on. also add $6 trillion to the deficit. that s a nice one. leave that aside, he is the former vice presidential nom fi of t nominee of the party so he has a claim on running because he wants to run. because he s so young he could wait until 2024 if he wants. this is very true. what about marco rubio, the so-called savior of the party according to time magazine.
the four other conservatives on the court? the difference is that roberts is a chief justice. and i think what you are overlooking is the sense that he he has of his institutional duties as the chief justice of the united states. he says part of his role as maintaining prestige and standing. he thought, mistakingly in my view, but he thought that by overruling such a sweeping piece of legislation that had been discussed in the congress for a year and a half, and duly passed, he would be exposing the court to the charge from democrats, we already heard intimations of t from the president and from, of course, the mainstream media that the court was acting politically in a partisan way and they gold back to the gore v. bush decision in 2000 where the court split ideologically and say this was a partisan act. i think he was intimidated.