they drop it for months at a time. that would make them vulnerable if a state took a waiver. wi we both know companies given an option will not cover pre-existing conditions if they are told they don t have to. why ignore those possibilities? because we have to look over the horizon and provide for flexibility at the state level to come up with ways to improve upon it. to do things better than what one size fits all doesn t work under obamacare. pulling money out of the system has never been shown to be a way to improve coverage in terms of how many people will get care. you are pulling $880 billion out of it over about a decade period. how will that help? that is one of the fundamental issues we have in the disagreement to the other side. the other side assumes putting money in the situation solves the problem.
trump either. brianna keilar. appreciate it. thank you. house republicans met with angry constituents this weekend in town halls after the house passed the gop bill to replace obamacare. one of them was new york congress member tom reed. he found himself with a teenager born with type i diabetes. look me in the eye how you can vote for the bill to take away mine and millions of others guarantees of being discriminated against because of a pre-existing conditions. the fact that the pre-existing conditions is in the bill will continue and you have access to health insurance as you do today. all right. mixed reaction to the answer. let s bring in tom reed. congress member, you were a yes before the amendments that were trying to soften the harsher