jenner. she made a big fashion faux pas. she was spotted in her car wearing and make america great again. now she s accused of turning her back on the party. she has also been accused of essentially being a traitor. the average on this has been so intense. it is almost comical how horrible she is. corona family doesn t talk to anymore. i don t blame them. i don t know if that s true. actions speak louder than words and we hear you loud and clear, caitlin jenner do not forget this moment when she changes her tune. she has apologized for wearing the hat. she says i apologize to all of the community. she essentially said she made a mistake. she also said that she was getting dressed in the dark. she didn t know what hashing it put on. pete: it sounds like they were
wonderful person. otherwise he has this habit as we ve seen, when he wants to seek distance from someone such as paul manafort, it s, i barely know that person. he was his campaign chairman and started inching away from him in a pronounced way. this is who he is and how he is. anyone who is surprised by how he s treating jeff sessions should only be surprised he is doing it from the west wing, not that he s doing it at all. but it s fascinating he does this from a distance, that he talks in front of a crowd about jeff sessions but doesn t talk to jeff sessions face. we don t actually know what their private conversations are. we know that jeff sessions, and this i continue to not understand to your question about what s real and what s not and what s known and what s not. jeff sessions offered his resignation several weeks ago and the president wouldn t take it. i don t know why it is the president is tormenting him. is there something the president has learned about where mueller
done for him. if some one is useful to him at any given moment. they re terrific and wonderful person. if they re not. he has a habit as i think we have seen repeatedly. when somebody wants to seek distance from some one, paul manafort, barely know that person. paul manafort was his campaign chairman. and then he started inching away from him in a pretty pronounced way. this is just who he is and huh he is. i think anyone is surprised by how he is treating sessions, should be surprise heed is doing it from the west wing not that he is doing it at all. fascinating to me that he does this from a distance. talks in front of a crowd about jeff sessions but doesn t talk to jeff sessions face. actually. we don t know what their private conversations are, number one. we do know that jeff sessions, i continue to not understand to your question about what is real and what is not here, and what s known and what is not. jeff sessions offered his resignation several weeks ago. the president
the republican party. if we weren t upset about it we have no right to complain in the future. this is about defending the democracy and the institution of election which is essential to people having faith in institution of government. i wish president trump would admit it. his administration has. i guess that is a first step. except that he is the commander in chief. leadership has to come from the top. in that vein as i ask you whether this president is soft on russia, i will ask you also to say are you disappointed that the obama administration did not more forcefully respond when it got this information as some in the obama administration were advocating? here is the quandary in what is happening between the last president and this president. this president doesn t talk very strong on russia but acts very strong on russia. the bombing on the air field in syria, hitting various forces aligned with assad, weapons to
there is a schizophrenia to what he has been saying this morning on talk shows. as i try to divine it, a couple of things come to mind. first is he s saying in very legalistic terms that the president has not received a target or subject letter from mueller so that he is technically in legal terms not a target of criminal investigation. fair enough. the president, of course, doesn t talk in legal terms, he talks in lay terms and he feels that he s under siege or under investigation, broadly speaking. those things are not necessarily in conflict with one another. with respect to the president being having received advice about the firing of comey and acting on that advice, the president said that that s not true. he said that he fired him because he had russia on his mind and that he was going to fire him regardless of those recommendations from sessions and comey. and, of course, it is not the justice department who is investigating the president now, it is the special counsel. the