lee and ben sass. likely break my heart, doesn t surprise me about cassidy but this would be a huge gift to the ccp. how do we advance our interests when prominent senators still aren t speaking clearly about the threat posed by the ccp? i m for more oversight but in this case i think you have many who felt they should deal with china as they hope they are rather than they conduct business. i view it from the other side. we need leverage to deal with china. the understand strength and power, they don t play by the same rules we do. they use slave labor, deeply subsidize industries, is not a level playing field when it comes to china. what we need to do is click back to where this all started after world war ii, the united states created favorable training terms with any country. now we have developed economies that elect our own that have uniquely unlevel playing fields.
doesn t surprise me about cassidy. by this would be a huge gift to the cc peer. how do we advance our interests when prominent senators still aren t seeing clearly about the threats posed by the ccp? to be clear, i am for more oversight of this administration through congress. in this case, give many who feel like they should deal china i view it from the other side. we need leverage. they understand strength and power. they do not play by the same set of rules we do. they steal intellectual property. the use slave labor. it s not a level playing field when it comes to china. but we need to do is basically things back toward this all started after world war ii. the united states created very favorable trade terms with many countries. now we have developed economies that are like her own that have uniquely unlevel playing fields with us. terms of trade therefore more favorable to them. laura: dumping products in the united states.