was there spying? what happened with these outrageous fisa warrants? it s time for us all to know. i know devin nunes is the chairman of the house intelligence committee. he has a right to see it. it s beyond him. all of us have a right to see what went down. we don t get clear answers. this has gone on for 1 1/2 years and time to put it in the rear view mirror. and the back and forth gets confusing. it s hard to know what people s motivations are and what they ultimately want. what we ultimately need is more transparency. we deserve to see some of these fisa applications. the root of it is using raw politicized intelligence, right? and lies. that was christopher steel. even he doesn t stand by in court what he turned up. he was fired. yeah. he was retailing this these claims by third removed sources and he was paid for.
iran was, what is the signal that north korea is going to take from this, that the u.s. doesn t stand by its deals, why would north korea make a deal with you? and he tried to turn that on its head. i also want to say one more thing. i interviewed then candidate trump the day that this deal was signed in july of 2015. about a month after he announced. from that minute, without even knowing the details, he said bad idea. i should be president. and i should rip it up and do it differently. he also said that the persians are great negotiators at the time. and he stands by that. jason, can i ask you this question. sure. doesn t this give iran a propaganda win? of course. two points that i want to make quickly. one, the president mentioned americans, hostages held in iran over the years and also the hostages currently being held in north korea. i don t see a way out for these people now. there is no more no more mechanism to negotiate with the iranians. you are talking about the
i think he s guilty of inprecision if anything. i think perhaps he saw the susan rice unmasking documents. it led him the send that tweet. it was an inprecise tweet. it was one that twitter wasn t the best medium. there are questions about the survey lebs of american citizens. the unmasking by the obama administration officials. unmasking is not what the president was talking about initially. that s not tapping i m asking that s surveillance. there is a case to be made that wiretapping is a term that s been used since the 80s, to mean surveillance in a broader means, a broader way. it can be defined broader just one correction on the timeline. he sent the tweet and called it a wiretap and learned from nunes in a meeting about the allegedly unmasking. he could not have been sending that tweet out thinking this was a scandal about unmasking.
ryan, i m curious what you made of that interview. and the president s refusal to say he says he doesn t stand by anything. and he s standing by those comments. it s interesting because he didn t make a case specifically. he threw out some words about surveillance and said you know what i m talking about. and didn t make a claim. it was a wiretap. then, he said, that the british surveillance intelligence services, perhaps, were responsible for this. and then, he said it was incidental collection and unmasking. there were three claims, each one was debunked, and there s no evidence for the wiretapping tweet or any of the others. he wants generally to be thought that there s something behind it, without making any specific claim anymore because all of the other ones have fallen apart. it seemed like he really gets
human beings. this is not a man who could have solved slave issues. trump has it wrong because he doesn t know anything about history and refuses to read the history of presidents who came before him. this is what you get when you have a president who doesn t read. thank you, guys. appreciate it. up next, an incredible story of a rogue fbi translator with top secret whool married an isis. wait until you hear where the isis bride is living right now.