is he literally laid out as the prosecutor everything that shows that hillary clinton was guilty of this, and then at theha end,e takes the role away from loretta lynch and says that there should be no further prosecution. over stepping his bounds, and saying that there should be intent and that the statuteha tt requires intent is totally erroneous, untrue, and not in the statute. juan: he said there was no evidence, as i remember. kimberly: he listed the whole thing. and said, wow, this is going to happen.ha thatna: i wonder about in some ways, because he knew that loretta lynch had the tendency to pressure to use the campaign language, i wonder if he did that press conference, when he laid out all then terrible things that hillary clinton has done and then doesn t recommend prosecution. remember during that time, the investigator usually just turns over the document and lets the doj decide.. maybe comey was thinking, if i do that this will never see the light of day. he knew they
look at this, and i want to talk to you about comey for second, is he literally laid out as the prosecutor everything that shows that hillary clinton was guilty of this, and then at the end, he takes the role away from loretta lynch and says that there should be no further prosecution. and saying that there should be intent and that the statute that requires intent is totally erroneous, untrue, and not in the statute. he listed the whole thing. and said wow, this is going to happen. dana: i wonder about that in some ways, because he knew that loretta lynch had the tendency to pressure to use the campaign anguish, i wonder if he did that press conference, when he laid out all the terrible things that hillary clinton has done and then doesn t recommend prosecution. remember during that time, the investigator usually just turns over the document and lets the doj decide. it may be comey was thinking, if i do that this will never see