it was the behaviors of our accounts. well, i don t understand that. if it s the behavior of our account, why is it only republicans that are having this problem? and what type of behavior? i m a police dog figure. i don t have really dangerous behavior on my twitter account. nothing that would prompt them to shadow ban me. so, i don t think their explanation is going far enough. and it is very concerning because conservative users are using these platforms. we are paying for advertising on many of these platforms. i want to know what is your process. be transparent. you owe that to your users to let us know that our voices will not be suppressed because you don t like what we think. ainsley: well, it s just annoying. because, if you are putting out a tweet and i, let s say i wanted to include you in the tweet and i start typing in your name, normally it pops up. and if you are a prominent individual, your name is going to pop up. and that s what s happening. democrats their names are
immediately politicize a tragedy and push for legislative change, i suppose, that wouldn t have prevented this attack. that s a consistent theme on the left here. instead of allowing us to come together and allow the president s words to be heeded by all americans, let law enforcement do their jobs, we have democrats, by in large, using this as an opportunity to push measures that wouldn t have prevented this or an attack in the future. they re banned, unless you bat it before 1986 and he has nothing on his record, except for a crazy father, which doesn t pop up on a background check. he doesn t have any violations. got the background check. bought the guns legally, but altered them illegally. then you have to ban youtube because they tell you on youtube how to make a semiautomatic an automatic. they should get clear on this and not just spout off. they can t help themselves.
administration felt needed scrutiny for travellers coming to the u.s. but bill: the reason i ask there are 40 other countries that are majority muslim not effected by the order. under that definition how do you consider it a muslim ban? the problem is donald trump and his administration picked countries out that sound scary, that look scary and intelligence and national security advisors and experts these aren t the places the terrorists have come from that attacked the u.s. why not saudi arabia and pakistan. they have sent more people to attack the u.s. it doesn t seem to be thought out. bill: i m almost out of time i don t mean to cut you off but i ll put you down as open minded for now and we ll see in 90 minutes. fair? i don t think it should exist in any form but if he feels he
challenge. we haven t seen it yet but thanks to our intrepid john roberts our chief correspondent at the white house we have a good idea what it says. we know for example they took the four orders of judges that had en joined its enforcement brooklyn, alexander, virginia and two in the west coast and circuit court and make a checklist of the judicial objections and formed it in two categories. one is what is the basis for the seven now six countries and on which the ban will be i am imposed and we ll see why the countries were chosen. it s a low bar for the president to meet a rational basis and if he gives a sound reason the judges can t drive a truck through that opening. shannon: though some have said we don t care what you say we re looking to past statements to see there s a religious a
james clapper is and the lack of credibility he has. the same nas director who lied under oath that the nsa was surveilling americans based on the things he wouldn t disclose. he s not the best source for the left and obama administration to be using in battling the issue but in terms of how we move forward it will be difficult for either side to get any evidence because if there is an ongoing investigation with the fbi they re going to deny it. they re not going to release the warrants and they re not going to comment on it and on the political side with the trump administration they re not going to get that information to be able to produce it to the public as evidence because it s an ongoing investigation. whether it s trau true or not is not based to be seen and if you look at the statement released by obama spokespersons it doesn t say the administration that no one in