to have a pathway to citizenship. it s a great country and that we allow people the freedom. tucker: why would you want someone in your country who s not grateful to be here, who s demanding of american citizens the rightt to vote and get benefits? 21 people who are grateful to be her and want to add? you know, every immigrant that i have met is grateful to be here. that doesn t mean that they are not going to stand up for their rights. i joined thousands of people across this country and protests that happened on saturday from people who were born and raised in this country and who have been here for generations. that is one of the hallmarks of our great society. tucker: but they are not americans, these people. but they have a voice, they have a right to a voice. just because they were not from here doesn t mean the constitution doesn t apply to you. that is well, well settled. tucker: know, if you broke our love to get here, you don t have the rights of american citizens.
crystalizes the panel here. just because he invokes the national security, it doesn t mean the constitution doesn t apply. you cannot rebuke this is an abuse of the power. they don t have the ability to review the executive action. they said we have the authority to do it. thes constitution is not written in invisible ink just because you look at it through the lens of the national security. that was the argument. as long as we are talking about national security. that is just not the law. they cited supreme court decisions. is decisions were written by supreme court justices. i m not sure that is where they want to end up. we will see what the department decides over the next few days. what is the next possibility here? presumably if they go to the full appellate court and