people really care about the pleasantness. they care about the net effecte. . senator mike lee actually pointed out that some of her rulings where she s verye devoted to the administrative state, to the swamp of washington, d.c.. she wouldn t even let a case be hearda in west virginia because she was focused on it being heard in d.c., which isd definitely the region that she is most beholden to. but yet temperament is finene and nice and pretty much anyonew who s a federal judge has a pretty good temperament. but that has nothing to do with the damage that can be causeded by nicely ruling againi all sorts of protections that we enjoy as americans. and that is what she has shown through her radical background. well,ck west virginia, look out if justice jackson is confirmed. molly, thank you . thank you . now it turns out the mere act of questioning a black woman up for a lifetime appointment is not just cruel, it s now racist. they seemt to be trying to bait her so that they can use a c
ijust again, focusing on manchn and the people of west virginia, their views of the constitution and the secondh amendment and how that s protected and should be protected,te he said in his statement supporting her that during our meeting sheor was wam and gracious. molly on the top ofd her impressiveon resume. she has the temperament to make an exceptional jurist now nothing temperament doesn t matter at all, but it kinda iski irrelevant when you re talking about applying law as written by representatives of a duly, duly elected representatives and supported by a sitting president. temperament really doesn t matter. it s the plainth language of the statute that governs governs it repeatedly. she just ignored plain statute and language and decided cases on the policy grounds like sheca did on that immigration right. ifif someone is pleasant while running roughshod over the constitution, i don t thinkar
okay is ridiculous. focusing on manchin and the people of west virginia. they re views of the constitution and the second amendment and how that it shoul be protected, he said in his statement supporting her that during our meeting she was warm and gracious, on the top of her impressive resume, she has the temperament to make an exceptional jurist. now i m not saying temperament doesn t matter at all, but it kind of is irrelevant when you re talking about applying law as written by representatives of the duly elected representatives and supported by a sitting president . temperament really doesn t matter. it s the playing language of th statute that governs yet repeatedly she ignored the statute in language and decided cases on policy grounds like sh did on that immigration case. if someone as pleasant while running roughshod over the constitution i don t think you