united all requiring vaccines for at least some employees. and even the nfl, which doesn t mandate vaccines said it will hold teams financially responsible for a covid case cancels the game. i wouldn t have gotten the vaccine without the protocols, to be honest. danny mire to going a step further. we re going to require that 100% of our staff members be vaccinated and any guest who wants to dine in doors will be vaccinated as well. how are you going to challenge customers that handle this? the same way we would challenge somebody who refused to show their id if they were under age at bar. we won t serve them. he ll look for proof via a vaccination card or digital passport. is mandating vaccines the
lester? bill karins staying on top of it for us, thank you. tonight as the pandemic worsens again, a growing number of companies are doing an about-face, requiring vaccinations and pushing back returning to the workplace. stephanie ruhle has that story. reporter: add uber to the fast-growing list. the ride-hailing giant i know making vaccinations mandatory for u.s. employees coming to the office. and delaying their global return to office by a month. employees are really responding to and reacting to colleagues in the workplace saying i want you to provide as reasonably safe as a workplace as you can. reporter: uber joins netflix, google, facebook, morgan stanley, lyft, united, the washington post and saks fifth avenue. all requiring vaccines for at least some employees. and even the nfl which doesn t mandate vaccines says it will hold teams financially responsible if a covid case cancels a game. i wouldn t have gotten the vaccine without the protocols they were enforcing
pretty fundamental things that most americans agree with, which is let s have mandated e-verify. make every employer do an e-verify on the immigration status. what they re calling the compromise bill, leland, doesn t mandate that so we re never going to fix the illegal immigration problem if we don t want that. leland: you don t think that the democrats want to fix this because it s i m cynical. leland: being intellectual ly i cynical with me, are there some republicans think this is better as a campaign issue than to compromise? i don t necessarily think some republicans want it as a campaign issue sadly opening up more opportunities for illegal immigration because a lot of chamber and commerces, as well. they raise a lot of money out of it or really think it s better for our economy to have a flee flow of cheap labor coming
american interest at stake here. i don t think we should take sides in this civil war. that s what the advocates of agd the opposition are wanting to advocate. but that s something they ve wanted to do for two, two and a half years. the argument that having drawn a red line and failed to do anything to about it once before and failing to do it again means the president has to act this time i think are clearly wrong as well. that s a classic example of what economists call the sunken cost fallacy. if you ve done one foolish thing what you ve done before doesn t mandate that you do another foolish thing. and the prospect of a minimal streak here really sends the exact opposite signal against the terms of chemical weapons. it s an encouragement, because the cost of using them is so low. even the new york times says if the u.s. does something, slap
factory farms and slaughter pan plants. would you support that kind of legislation? that s what this farm protection legislation is. it mandates that these groups turn footage over to the proper authorities. there s animal cruelty laws in every state and mandates they turn that footage over and not do what they have been doing which is taking the video and cutting and running and then running that video weeks or months later under a big donate now button and releasing it direct to the media or to large corporations. it mandates reporting. it doesn t stifle it. what that legislation does right now is make it criminal to shoot the video. why should you turn in a whistle-blower as being the crook here? it doesn t criminalize shooting the video. it criminalizes using that video and releasing it direct to the media. it mandates you report legitimate instances of abuse immediately within 24 to 48 hours. doesn t mandate that you cover it up. this is trying to prevent activists from us