couldn t understand after weeks of this hanging on, where religious institutions in this country were saying don t mandate that we do something that is against our faith principles. the 5d managers the administration wouldn t do it. they did offer services for free, which is a distinction without a difference, and i couldn t understand why the administration is pushing this. well then i undersphood it. when secretary sebelius said that pregnancy is basically an expense and that means by not having to pay for prenationallal care, not having to pay for delivery and pediatric costs of raising a child they figured it could save money and it baffled me how we were going to expect to have to pay for health care by not having babies. i thought that was one of the points of providing health care for women. and quite frankly, it doesn t make sense financially, and it certainly is an offense to the faiths that all along were trying to bring this up. martha: it comes down to this, perhaps. she