the full marginal rate, this doesn t kick in in the same way. forget about even changing the tax laws. here is something that i would love for you to explain to me. the bipartisan plan originally wanted to fund the irs $80 billion just to enforce what is already on the books. this would have been the best return on investment out of anything in there. why on earth did it get dropped? you know, stephanie, this is like one of the things that makes your head want to explode. correct. exactly, give the irs enough money and i want to throw in a commercial on this. enough permanent funding so that they can invest vest the kind of teams they need to be able to [ inaudible question ] it folks at the high end. auditing folks with low incomes is actually pretty easy.
to contribute more, even if you re paying less for your plan, once you go to the hospital to actually use the plan, it doesn t kick in for a few thousand dollars. which is why you re paying more out of pocket. i learned two things. it s going to cost me for for healthcare going forward and number two you have really good hand writing. thank you so much. i. obamacare has a lot of vulnerable democrats feeling sick and republican challengers feeling good. mead is alaska s republican lieutenant governor and is hoping to get a chance to but senator out of office. we saw some polls and it s a neck to neck race between you and the senator. go ahead. we have a good chance to win this race. alaskans voted for mitt romney in 2012 and they will stick to their principles principles andp
to the russian and chinese security agencies. then claim to be a patriot. look, i agree this is not a left-right case. it isn t only the judge who is a bush appointee. the plaintiff is a conservative. right. there are a lot of people sincerely and collectly on the left and right who object. libertarians on the right. civil libertarians also on the left. aclu types. we will see. i would like to see the resolution not happen in a court. leave it to the congress meaning the democratic process to decide to impose on it. if a court says it is okay that doesn t mean it has to be. let the people decide in congress assembly. that s what madison intended. they are the one withes who
congress and elected leaders to honor their word. we don t have a union representing us. we have our faith in government to honor the promises they have made to those who served. let s also point out that the $7 billion in savings this plan will generate doesn t even cover the interest the interest in the additional expenses that this same bill authorizes. paul ryan said, well, a lot of the retirees have a second job. so they are not living and eating off of this pension. your thoughts? well, i think that s a case-by-case basis and it doesn t matter. the fact is these are earned benefits. this is not a social welfare program. these are our earned benefits. we have paid in time and commitment to the military in order to have these earned benefits. these are promises that were made to us. some of us agreed to stay in the military longer at congressional bidding because the military needed us and we want them to
s the older one is dead. they talk about the younger one grappling with mental illness and the father may have been brutalized. who cares? don t we care because we want to spot these guys and understand warning signs prior to it s fair to want to investigate criminals. there is a reason you have crime reporters. i would suggestion that this is presenting rose colored facts and providing bullets telling you what to take away from the investigation. so the idea that they are masking this as journalism is a misnomer. they say we did it for five months and we found this was a misconception and this was. that s telling a story you want told. the victims are upset. we don t need to add to it. now out in san francisco, for a while now, they have been banning the box on unemployment applications where they ask if you have been convicted of a crime. for a long time it s been you