first of all, don t put words in my mouth. i read the debates. let s understand very clearly, very clearly what the constitution says very clearly. at the end of the 14th amendment it s clear. hang on. at the end of the 14th amendment it says congress will regulate this amendment. all it takes is clarification. we ll have to leave it there. you guys go to the extreme. you want to round them all up? that s not the issue. enforce the law. they ll leave on their own. we ll have to leave it there. appreciate you being with us, senator pearce. thank you, anderson. and roland martin as well. we ll take you inside a sanctuary city and talk to an illegal immigrant who has been in the country for years and why he thinks he should be allowed to say and surprisingly who he thinks should be sent home. could switching to geico really save you
shouldn t you not be calling for more government? the anti-defamation league, former mayor rudy giuliani, former governor george pataki, agree with me. people that have been through the 9/11 situation. mayor bloomberg doesn t support this at all and says it s completely then you have peter king, former chairman of the homeland security committee and the house of representatives who agrees with our position. in fact, when you have an imam who is associated with predonna global, the group that tried to run the blockade finance the blockade you say he s associated with that group. yeah. in truth, he spoke at a thing years ago that was sponsored by them. he says he s not a leader of that group. though it may say so on a website somewhere. he is listed as an important figure on their website. if all of his connections it seems like a lot of criticisms of this guy who, again, the state department is sending out to represent muslims in america. it seems like the critic
my question really is, when you have an imam spearheading this effort on the very month we were attacked on 9/11 said we were effectively responsible for the attack, that we were an accomplish in his words to the crime. when he said that osama bin laden was effectively created in the u.s. and refuses to condemn or distance himself from hamas, that raises some questions. he says he s not a supporter of hamas but is not necessarily going out there, condemning it. the u.s. state department sends him out around the world to basically be a bridge to the rest of the muslim world and say that the u.s. doesn t have a war against islam. aren t you proving the opposite point? aren t you showing that the u.s. has a problem with muslims? i think, in fact, if you had nothing to hide, you would be very comfortable saying to people that have a lot of emotional investment in this area, i have nothing to hide. we ll be happy to show you what the funding sources is. in fact but you say a governm
you re a republican. shouldn t you not be calling for more government intrusion? the anti-defamation league, former mayor rudy giuliani, george patacki. mayor bloomberg doesn t support this at all and says it s completely then you have peter king, former chairman of the homeland security committee and the house of representatives who agrees with our position. in fact, when you have an imam who is associated with predonna global, the group that tried to finance the blockade you say he s associated with that group. yeah. in truth, he spoke at a thing years ago that was sponsored by them. he says he s not a leader of that group. though it may say so on a website. he is listed as an important figure on their website. if all of his connections it seems like a lot of criticisms of this guy who, again, the state department is sending out to represent muslims in america. it seems like the criticism is, well, his wife s uncle is once something no, no, no.
spearheading this effort, on the very month we were attacked on 9/11 said we were effectively responsible for that attack, that we were an accomplice, in his word, to the crime. when he said that osama bin laden was effectively created in the u.s. and refuses to condemn or distance himself from hamas, that raises he says he s not a supporter of hamas but is not necessarily going out there, condemning it. the u.s. state department sends him out around the world to basically be a bridge to the rest of the muslim world and say that the u.s. doesn t have a war against islam. aren t you proving the opposite point? aren t you showing that the u.s. has a problem with muslims? if you had nothing to hide, you would be very comfortable saying to people that have a lot of emotional investment in this area, i have nothing to hide. we ll be happy to show you what the funding sources is. in fact but you say a government investigation of a religious group, an islamic center without any evid