this decision by the 9th circuit? what are the weak points here? so what we can probably expect to see is what they did in the district court in seattle. and they went about this in two ways. the first is a procedural type of weigh-in to say look, the washington state attorney general doesn t have standing to sue, they haven t been injured in a way that is meaningful. and that s the procedural route. the second route would be on the merits, a substantive argument that would really emphasize the president s broad discretion in the area of immigration and national security and would say in that context his order stands. laura jarrett, danny cevallos, thank you both for the time on this saturday night. we still have much more ahead. so stay with us. we re still following these protests at home but also abroad. thousands demonstrating against president trump and his travel ban. we ll talk about the global reaction to this controversy right after this.
enforce the law act which would actually let lawmakers sue any president who doesn t enforce laws. basically file it with a three judge federal panel and then appeal whatever the decision is to the supreme court if they wanted to. the white house has already issued its veto threat. harry reid, the democratic majority leader in the president said it s doa, dead on arrival. right. it s worth noting here bill that democrats tried to pass a law similar to this when george w. bush was the president and republicans blocked it then. supreme court precedence for a linger time have consistently said that congress really doesn t have standing to sue the president there is a whole bunch of historical predispositions against that called checks and balances that give the legislative branch and jiewcialg branch opportunities to check it. they say it s not necessary. redundant short of impeachment. symbolic thing to bring attention to the fact that some people feel the president is abusing his
enforce the law act which would actually let lawmakers sue any president who doesn t enforce laws. basically file it with a three judge federal panel and then appeal whatever the decision is to the supreme court if they wanted to. the white house has already issued its veto threat. harry reid, the democratic majority leader in the president said it s doa, dead on arrival. right. it s worth noting here bill that democrats tried to pass a law similar to this when george w. bush was the president and republicans blocked it then. supreme court precedence for a linger time have consistently said that congress really doesn t have standing to sue the president there is a whole bunch of historical predispositions against that called checks and balances that give the legislative branch and jiewcialg branch opportunities to check it. they say it s not necessary. redundant short of impeachment. symbolic thing to bring attention to the fact that some people feel the president is abusing his