tennis shoes was about the only given that we had. a month after audrey s death, a pedestrian found her purse in a field about a mile from her home. her identification was inside, but all the money was gone. this proved robbery was a motive, but why murder? it was an unanswered question for all of us. it was like, who would do this, why would they do it, and how? how did they choose her? research shows criminals often commit their crimes close to where they live. so, police focused their search in the surrounding areas but got no leads. you always fear that this might be one of those cold cases that might end up on the shelf, and this was a very, very serious case. so, we had this concern that we hoped this one doesn t go cold. then, six weeks after
the fact that he s wearing tennis shoes was about the only given that we had. a month after audrey s death, a pedestrian found her purse in a field about a mile from her home. her identification was inside, but all the money was gone. this proved robbery was a motive, but why murder? it was an unanswered question for all of us. it was like, who would do this, why would they do it, and how? how did they choose her? research shows criminals often commit their crimes close to where they live. so, police focused their search in the surrounding areas but got no leads. you always fear that this might be one of those cold cases that might end up on the shelf, and this was a very, very serious case. so, we had this concern that we hoped this one doesn t go cold. then, six weeks after audrey s murder, police got a break.
wasn t complete, so some details were unclear. the fact that he s wearing tennis shoes was about the only given that we had. a month after audrey s death, a pedestrian found her purse in a field about a mile from her home. her identification was inside, but all the money was gone. this proved robbery was a motive, but why murder? it was an unanswered question for all of us. it was like, who would do this, why would they do it, and how? how did they choose her? research shows criminals often commit their crimes close to where they live. so, police focused their search in the surrounding areas but got no leads. you always fear that this might be one of those cold cases that might end up on the shelf, and this was a very, very serious case. so, we had this concern that we hoped this one doesn t go cold. then, six weeks after audrey s murder, police got a
car, the field behind her house on the ground, on horse b.c. and still no sign. it was her friends and family s worst nightmare. but for the police, everyone is a suspect at the beginning of an investigation like this. the police looked at everybody around her because usually that s where you start. the family and rob, the boyfriend, we didn t have to go to them. they came to us, which some people would automatically say they re ruled out. that s not the case. i mean, obviously i m not naive. i watch the television and the news stories. they say that most of these cases the person who is the closest or people who are closest are the perpetrators. i came into the situation expecting people to point fingers at me. had you known him long before january of 06? we had met him in 2005. and they were great together.
parking next to the pool area and jennifer s car is exactly in this spot it was the third spot over from the fencing. we thought this will be what these parents needed. her car is here. there will be at least be dna. is she in the trunk? i think it s a parent s worst nightmare. i mean, you don t know what you re going to find. it was emotional. very little was found in that car that was able to help them at all with the case. there is no indication that jennifer would have been a victim of a robbery. there were valuable in the car. there was a defevd player ine back. nothing was stolen out of the vehicle. they came up with one latent print and one piece of tiny fiber dna.