didn t make any firm agreements. let s go to our global foreign affai affairs correspondent one said the summit itself was meaningless? reporter: brooke, it is interesting how the administration is spinning it. no one knows as we have been discussing what went on in this meeting. i think what u.s. officials have told me is european officials were really afraid that president trump was kind of going to give away the store to president putin, and that didn t seem to have happened. there s a lot of talk about vague agreements, but president trump doesn t seem to have made any ironclad agreements with president putin. certainly none of his top aides have gotten any instruction about new policy directives, so in a sense this was talk between president trump and president putin that often doesn t go anywhere because president trump makes a lot of agreements in meetings and then when diplomats
i m sure you can. still, really? yeah, absolutely. it s our measure of authenticity. people are allegation trying to bus people. what is a toff? an aristocrat. my friend adrian wrote a book called the angry isle and he talked about how the british are famous for being polite, apologizing. but that masks a deep anger. do you think there is any truth to that at all? i spent a lot of time in california which is, you know, when you come to london, if you come to london for a month, you won t make any friends. you won t find anywhere to go. after that the best people you ever met in your life. when i went to l.a. the first month, i was so popular, i saw six bands, then nothing comes of it. there is a real first impression thing that doesn t go anywhere. in london it s just get on down and deal with it.
political case. what does he get out of this? he s trying to make sure his client, the president, doesn t go anywhere near a grand jury, doesn t put himself under oath or doesn t put himself in danger of perjury or obstruction of justice. he s doing what a good lawyer should do. on the other hand, it s not as cut and dry as he makes it seem. we ve come close to this point before in the clinton impeachment case, in the nixon watergate case but we never worked through this and the point is we have principals and we have institutions and we have traditions that enable us to walk through these. what s important is not whether there s a report, whether there s an indictment or impeachment. that s what the president is worried about understandably, for the rest of us we should be concerned about, do we have a way to respond do we have a way of finding out the actual truth, do we have a way of responding to it with all of the different mechanisms and it includes impeachment but it include
jamie hince: that doesn t go anywhere. in london, it s just get on down and deal with it. anthony: right. jamie hince: yay. see, here they come. anthony: it s the point. jamie hince: we re closing. closing. anthony: they re closing. yeah. jamie hince: get tony some. news reporter: the staggering news is now sinking in. news reporter 2: the markets are getting a brutal reaction. anthony: when the world seems like it s spinning out of control, and the inside of your skull feels like it s being gnawed on by angry wolverines. news reporter 3: the sun has risen on a completely different u.k., and a completely different e.u. anthony: when you wake up still tasting tequila, feeling shame, fear, and regret in equal measures, it s good to have a friend. news reporter 4: europe s weaker, britain s divided, where do we go now? anthony: who, without judgment, gives you a shoulder to cry on and, maybe, a simple good thing, like some eggs and sympathy. i m horribly and sa
trump who says daca fix, do something about chain migration, get rid of the diversity lottery and str the wall and technology to defend the border. there is so much difference between these two it won t go anywhere. even if this doesn t go anywhere. this may be a situation where there has to be more than this and less than that in order to get something done. melissa: how do democrats justify opposing what the president is offering in the sense that how do they go back to two million dreamers and say we said no to your deal. we say no to citizens and protecting the border, because we re so upset about theoretical immigrants out in the future. look, the democrats do have a problem here because remember, they could have solved this any way they wanted to in 2009 and 2010 when they had overwhelming majorities in the congress. president obama had opposed comprehensive reform in 2007.