counterargument is, well, there s a statute that mandates that you do at least pay your workers. that s the rub, that s the fight that i think we would have to see months down the line probably to get a ruling in this particular case. so opm, the office of personal management, has given a form letter to workers who need to send a letter to their bank for their mortgage or landlord or whoever else they might be needing to pay a bill to, a creditor. they can t pay because they re not getting their paycheck. that s remarkable. it does signal that we could be in this for the long haul. legally speaking, can workers use that in any way? well, they can use it. there s no legal obligation on the part of your bank to look beyond the fact that you haven t paid your mortgage, right. so it doesn t confer on the employee any protection, that is legal protection. as kim said, there is no
on tv, and say their political enemies don t care. cnn got very upset when dana lash said cnn doesn t get upset. anchors or reporters may challenge something. that s not a network-wide thing. but reporters need to challenge. i need again, the reporters are the representatives of the network. when i tune in there is a reporter on cnn and the cnn insignia is in the bottom corner and there is nothing i can do by say, cnn may have a bias here, especially if that bias all runs in one direction. it s not like members of the cnn are pushing one agenda. if there is a bias it is universally to one side, and that s what people on the right are seeing. the agenda of being pushed is gun control by interviewing students who are scared to go back to school. is that how you perceive it? the agenda being pushed is gun control if there is no pushback on questions asked to other guests. that doesn t confer for expertise.
forward and admit that? well, because of the fear of the nra leadership, which is fanatic, which lies to gun owners and says that any attempt to regulate guns in any way is a prelude to taking all your guns away. luckily, the power of the nra was shown to be a paper tiger in the last election. i think that knowledge is going to have to be broadcast and assimilated that you can take on the nra and live to tell about it. you know, no right is absolute. we have the first amendment right to freedom of speech, but you can t get away with yelling fire in a crowded theater. so second amendment, the supreme court has ruled the second amendment confers a personal right to carry arms, but it doesn t confer a personal right to carry machine guns or grenade launchers or semiautomatic weapons, or large magazine clips. there is no hunter that needs more than three bullets in a rifle to hunt. anything beyond that is not only fair subject for regulation, but
court has ruled the second amendment confers a personal right to carry arms, but it doesn t confer a personal right to carry machine guns or grenade launchers or semiautomatic weapons, or large magazine clips. there is no hunter that needs more than three bullets in a rifle to hunt. anything beyond that is not only fair subject for regulation, but absolutely ought to be banned. but there is very few hunters out there that want to be hold what kind of firearm they can use. this is theish urban divide that the president talked about today. over the last 30 years before i came to work here in new york. it s two different worlds. you go to the middle of the country and they say don t you come close to me with any firearm regulation, and don t tell me how to use my firearm. i don t want any regulation whatsoever. here in new york, here in new york city, the laws are about as strict as they are anywhere in the country. so how do we strike this balance?
it. you know, no right is absolute. we have the first amendment right to freedom of speech, but you can t get away with yelling fire in a crowded theater. so second amendment, the supreme court has ruled the second amendment confers a personal right to carry arms, but it doesn t confer a personal right to carry machine guns or grenade launchers or semiautomatic weapons, or large magazine clips. there is no hunter that needs more than three bullets in a rifle to hunt. anything beyond that is not only fair subject for regulation, but absolutely ought to be banned. but there is very few hunters out there that want to be hold what kind of firearm they can use. this is the urban divide that the president talked about today. over the last 30 years before i came to work here in new york. it s two different worlds. you go to the middle of the country and they say don t you come close to me with any