way. it s calleunts by d count stacku 31 of the counts of willfulul retention of national defensede information, six process crimefs . president trump is calling this election interference at the highest level. members of congress are now openly comparing the u.s..presi government to a corrupt banana republic. and ondelling this elect progra onrk levin, called it a war on the republic. and coming up tonight, we ll get full legal analysis from our own great jarrett alan dershowitz, former acting attorney general matt whitakeret . we ll also hear from former speaker of the house newt gingrich. hous matt whd the former se judiciae chairman jim jordan. and later, stay tuned for my preview of my exclusive interview with california governor gavin newsom. that s all coming up this friday night. but first, wnewte begin with aih statement that you hear a lot from the left. nobodycalifoovernor is above t. they say there is one set of rules for every american. in fact, the doj special c
entitled to keep whatever he wanted after leavinglyton was ,o it was classified or not.r so that s trump s main defense. and the judge in the case endorsed it. rsed i the judge ruled the national archives doesn t havt.d the e ay to decide presidential records, and that seizing from a former president is unfounded and contrary to the law. so trump relied on that standard that should be his defense. all right. let me let me go to the statement, professor dershowitz. today. we have one set of laws in this country and they apply to everybody. n we can go to the tapean that i just played and then this particular case, it was james comey admitting that hillary had top secret classified materials all over her servers. mittin i would argug e that deletingwo 33,000 subpoenaed emailsar and destroying devices that may have that information on it. that to me, and maybe i m just told that would that would fit