we ve seen trump do this repeatedly and others in his orbit, oh, just kidding, bannon, don t take me seriously. the freedom of speech thing is going to become so seriously eroded that the value we cherish that someday if we get it curtailed we re going to look back at this time period, nicolle, and we re going to say it was people like marjorie taylor greene that screwed this up. you know, this is why we can t have nice things, because people instigate violence and get somebody killed. and so yes, it s a law enforcement problem but so much bigger than law enforcement is this use of freedom of speech, freedom of speech, i can say whatever i want, and then claim it s a joke. that doesn t cut it. the freedom of speech comes with tremendous responsibility. and none of these people seem to be held accountable for what they re doing. and frank, i guess what i want to follow up with and ask you is what do you what do you make of an elected official who s using the language of war and insu
all the way to the president. but hunter biden is no more slub as he says. hunter biden is a grown man. and the things that he has allegedly done to his family to use his brother in a way to mask his own addiction. we are talking about accountability here. i don t care how are. if you are going to be in the public eye the way he has. make millions of dollars for it you better be held accountable. i don t want either one of them getting a pass and this idea that it s only about president biden. that doesn t cut it for me. rachel: i don t think it s only about joe biden. i do think it s easy to get lost in the porn and hookers and the drugs and everything else and focus on hunter because it s salacious. it s not even about the money. you know what? nancy pelosi is making a lot of money, her and her husband through insider trading. i hate that i think it should be investigated. but this is different. this isn t just about corruption. this is about a national security threat. he is compr
pennsylvania and be transparent and release the medical from records. let s hear from the doctorsth that treated your stroke, donoo john , a campaign donor doctor and joe bidenr d joe sag that you re capable.speaking that doesn t cut it. and by the way, speaking, joey, he apparently thinks that veteran s wife is running notd not john not john saying as much earlier. today in pittsburgh. ha. che a look john , thank you very much for for running. i really do appreciate it. and , joe , you re going toe a you re going to be a great, great lady in the senate. in th huh? . anyway, here with reaction, republican congressman fromblicn ohio, jim jordan, along with fox news contributor jason chaffetz. jim , jordan, i start with you. you know, the fact that it s forty four , forty four in georgia, i kind of like that for one reason. i ll explain in a minute. forty six . forty six in pennsylvania. laxalt up by one in nevada. and blake marsters down by one in arizona. i like it for this rea
sort of analyze this on two axes, two dimensions, essentially. you have to have a really, really serious crime, and you have to have very, very strong evidence. so, in other words, really good evidence of let s say, near and his handling, in my view, doesn t cut it. and a very serious crime like espionage is not something you could bring with four mediocre evidence. so the next step where prosecutors and agents to figure out what can be proof, and how strong is that proof? what elements of this statutes do we think we can convince a jury of, buy proof beyond reasonable doubt? that is harder than publishing it in the newspaper. by the way, i think the reporting has been great. i don t mean that as it s just a different standard. absolutely agree. i think that s actually a really useful way of thinking about it. really strong evidence of a serious crime, right? there are high bars to clear on
student if not, you are eligible to there is a lot of excitement around this move, and it s a big one. but there is a fair amount of criticism, so i want to look at some of that first. first, off some bore we say $10,000 to $20,000 in debt forgiveness simply doesn t cut. some democrats agree with that, by the way. $10,000 is just a drop in the bucket for many people and student loans this professionally affects people of color. for giving a little more would go a long way. on the other hand, there is the argument that this creates something called moral hazard, that the government is rewarding people for making the personal choice to take out loans that they may not be able to pay back to put themselves through college. and that leads out those who chose not to attend college or did not take loans for it. then there is the argument, largely coming from the right, that forgiving student loan debt could cause already high inflation to for the rise. to those folks, i say, if we are go