first, i personally approve the decision to seek a search warrant in this matter. second, the department starts does not take and that decision lightly. donald trump could reveal the details of the fbi search right now. but he hasn t. i wonder why? the doj is moving to that information public. a new reporting on a subpoena from this for sensitive document the fbi believed trump still improperly holding on to lead new details on the armed man who tried to reach an fbi office in cincinnati this morning. guess what that suspect that was on january 6? we begin the read out tonight with the silence spoken i doj. after three days, allowing donald trump and his allies. the receipt, relating to this week, that search was belonging to the former president. that means the documents will likely become public which would provide a window into what investigators were looking for at the property and what time they believe may have been committed. as well as, what was actually collect i
By victims families. A potentially explosive report in the New York Times reveals that the us president is not all that he is trumped up to be an exhaustive report documents that Donald Trumps wealth came from his father who transferred it all to his children under dubious circumstances. Also in the program concerns over the Italian Economy are keeping the e. U. Worried but now it signals it is ready for a compromise on government spending. And there are all kinds of reasons you would not invited a cow to dinner but now there is one less excuse thanks to a cattle feed company in switzerland well tell you what that is all about. How you got to get us welcome to the program we begin with some strong numbers for
the u. S. Economy a survey by Payroll Processor a. D. P. Showed strong hiring by private businesses in the United States in september and Services Firms produced more and hired more workers the National Employment report showed private payrolls jumped by Two Hundred Thirty Thousan
counsel s team really called that huge gap in time unwarranted and unnecessary. the big sticking point here is mostly about how many documents trump s team is going to review. the special counsel has said in open court and filings that there are 11.6 million pages of documents as part of the discovery and when trump s team laid out the arguments for delaying until 2026, they laid out the images of how many pages that actually s and in fact, they compared it at one point to the washington monument stacked on top of itself eight times with one million pages to spare in their words. but the special counsel is shooting back and saying that the description is overblown. specifically, they are saying that the former president and his team should really already be familiar with most of the documents as part of this discovery. they are putting it this way, and saying that the lengthy time needed to review rests on the faulty assertion that it is necessary for a lawyer to conduct a page-by-page
sentencing guidelines, which are advisory, judges take them into account but they re not binding, i ran a rough calculation, something in the 8 to 12 year range. that s a lot. judges can go below that. what i feel confident saying, if trump is convicted on this indictment this is a prison case. the manhattan case, i don t believe is likely, knowing that new york law, that could well be a probation case. this one if there s a conviction it s a prison case. since it s extraordinary circumstances, it could be house arrest. judges can take into account the person s age, all sorts of factors. it s possible, but looking at the guidelines, prison is likely. andrew mccabe, we know from the documents trump s legal team returned to the national archives include five confidential document, 16 secret documents, 1 top secret documents. the average person out there has no idea what that means, confidential, secret, top secret. what does it tell you about the kind of information trump was
just documents i get to take. that s exactly what it gets you. as a prosecutor, john, it s important to understand this does not mean they ran a sort of fire drill like you would in high school where they said let s practice. it sounds like it but that is not exactly the reporting from josh dossy. the judge said when the archives first started asking about these documents trump s team engaged in an effort to mislead and did it again when doj came to town, the first time was a dress rehearsal and that s crucial evidence of intent because you argue to a jury they did this more than once, as part of a plan and did this with intent to deceive the doj and that s gets you obstruction. you and other members of our team have been here with new details of the investigation in recent days and weeks as well. what does that tell us about the time line? it seems to indicate at least the grand jury that is looking