tonight, on all in. we are obligated to seek answers directly from the man who sent us all in motion. the january 6th committee, commanding donald trump s appearance on the day that steve bannon gets to prison for blowing them off. tonight, george conway on the documents, and testimony that the committee is seeking in the subpoena of donald trump. then, why was the ex president, reportedly, keeping classified intelligence about iran, and china? explosive new details is the stolen documents at mar-a-lago. plus, the victims of the wrong desantis election fraud stunt has charges dropped. no referred to the doj from arizona, and an all in, starting right now good evening, from new york, i m chris hayes. there s many crimes of donald trump stands accused, of many legal challenges he faces, the can be difficult to keep trap. there is, of course, the investigation into classified documents that he appears to have stolen, and hoarded, in the basement of his retirement home. we wi
make sure that the american public sees all of this classified information. don t understand estimate somebody like special counsel jack smith. this is not his first time at the rodeo. he knows when it comes to classified document litigation, he knows what s at stake here. if you think jack smith and his team have not considered the ramifications of having to present a case where the prosecution carries the burden of proof beyond the exclusion of every reasonable duty that you estimate to the detriment if you re donald trump, cipa, the classified informations procedures act, is exquisitely clear in terms of timing of hearing of objections and challenges by the doj in this instance. it s not the first time this is litigated. there s a reason why a statute exists to be able to aileen cannon will get a detailing of it. judge, this is how it s supposed
legal assistance lawyers paula jones, and her sexual harassment suit against, and sitting president, donald bill clinton in the 1990s. can i get your reaction to this document, in terms of laying out the case, and establishing the motive, or to have reason to subpoena, and speak on the documents that they are seeking? my reaction was guilty, guilty, guilty, on all counts. this is a draft indictment. in time, they still have to contain the evidence, it lays out the different ways, in which i think, and hope, that the justice department, someday, has the judge in california demanded, at least in document litigation, the trump committed violations of three 71, conspiracy to defraud the united states, in 18 usc 12, which isn t obstruction. obstruction of a congressional proceeding, for official