mark: doctor john eastman you are a constitutional expert and this is rejection by the democratic party and the rest of the media and the rejection of the election. i think so. they still can t believe they lost the election in trying to rationalize the most but something nefarious will put it in historical context. we confronted a situation likehi this three times in our nations history. 1801st time there was a change of power one party to another office and defeated adams and took him a while but adams finally handed the baton over peaceably but that was bootable and multiple votes and i house f representatives finally hamilton through his 42 jefferson who he cannot stand but can t stande john adams even more. right.
doctor john eastman, your constitutional expert. this is really rejection by the democrat party in the media and the rest of them. rejection of the 2016 election, isn t it. i think so. they still can t believe they lost that election. they re trying to rationalize that there must ve been something nefarious but let s put it in historical context. i think we confronted the situation like this three times in our nations history. 1800, first time there was a change of power, one party to another, jefferson defeated adams, took him a while but adams finally handed the baton over peacefully. that was brutal and there were multiple votes in the house of representatives and finally hamilton throws his support to jefferson who he cannot stand, but he can t stand john adams even more.
marching today. the protest movement started one month ago sparked by a bill proposing changes to extradition laws that would seize hong kong residents facing trial in mainland china. the bill has been suspended but protesters wanted formally withdrawn. i m i.c.e. not husky now back to life, liberty and levin . mark: doctor eastman, i see a basic thread here look at the democrats on the house judiciary committee and oversight committee and i look at the media in the country and they believe the constitution believes of one phrase and protect them. there is a disregard if not repudiation of our constitution and the same people who are attacking this president think he is violating the constitution although for the life of me i can t figure out how he wants to be a c dictator for the life ofe i can t figure out how is not fdr after all and i look at this