counterintelligence has some experience, but not traditionally where you look. and this is where katie may have more intel. which is who is staffing this. because that i think is really going to be a sign for whether the department is taking this so seriously that they want to have this cross the finish line and they understand the importance of speed in having that done. katie. sure. so on the staffing concern, i think thatandrew s point is serious. i ve heard that the justice department is being extremely careful about who goes on dockets, who appears in court. they are trying not to give the public too much more information about names of people working on this case because of security reasons. there have been so many threats against for example jay bratt who is named on all these documents who appeared in court. and others including the fbi agents whose names were on the
indicted just on classified documents unless merrick garvin has something else showing over actions to harm national security. i think it s very difficult for him to bring charges on classified dockets give it leniency in the past or democrats. mike: back to mcconnell. is it helpful when republicans are bickering with each other, mark? i don t think a lot of americans in a concentrate on that. and 65 for going have a decisive victory. we are technic crime and joe biden s america, for your time but a crisis at the border of 200,000 illegals crossing every month. if we are talking about inflation. if we are talk about the reality going into a deeper recession and will be by november. if instead we are talking about taking aoc talking points about defunding law enforcement or pardoning criminals, that s going to get us off a message. we are talking about joe biden i think he did with that terrible speech that certainly was
the judge will appoint this special master which essentially will bring in a third party, could be a retired judge, could be at connected down and put some brakes on this investigation, neil. neil: so if you can help me with this, she could release a more detailed list of materials that were taken from donald trump s home. how would that bhandled, what might that mean? correct. we re told that would come out likely as a number on the public dockets. we re all watching the public docket the next few days to see if there s more detail to see what was taken from the former president s home. we got list as couple weeks ago after attorney general merrick garland issued the search warrants. we got limited details. if this comes out soon, which she says it will come out, that is something that ke will be
the voter will decide how many of a hamstring you want on somebody that is running for or carrying out the duties of the presidency. we re getting way ahead of ourselves. i m not so sure this won t play out until after the mid-terms. it s not convinced the democrats may not decide that they prefer a wounded trump with the possibility of indictment hanging over his head to an indicted defendant. i think they may decide that they like the former better than the latter. neil: that s how you ended your column. i thought that was a very interesting take on it here. that might be where all of this goes. we ll see what happens. andy, thanks very much. andy mccarthy following the latest developments. we re waiting for the evidence that the judge in this case might put out there in the public record, public dockets for everyone to read. might not be a lot of stuff but