people, entirely illegal, astute chemical weapons. you people, entirely illegal, astute chemical weapons. people, entirely illegal, astute chemical weapons. chemicalweapons. you know, is it a red line, chemicalweapons. you know, is it a red line. do chemicalweapons. you know, is it a red line. do you chemicalweapons. you know, is it a red line, do you think, chemicalweapons. you know, is it a red line, do you think, in chemicalweapons. you know, is it a red line, do you think, in ukraine, i red line, do you think, in ukraine, you mention syria there. i think a lot of people felt it weakened the battle against the president of syria underformer us president barack 0bama when he didn t act following a chemical attack in that country. do you think of it could be proven, verified, would it make a difference, particularly with the involvement of nato, for example? well, i would think it would mean ratcheting up the pressure even more. to keep in mind that a very big bed liners alre
eliminating terms of sanctions. so, sanctions. eliminating imports terms of sanctions. so, sanctions. eliminating imports of terms of sanctions. so, sanctions. eliminating imports of oil- terms of sanctions. so, sanctions. eliminating imports of oil and - terms of sanctions. so, sanctions. j eliminating imports of oil and gas, for instance. i eliminating imports of oil and gas, for instance- eliminating imports of oil and gas, for instance. ., ., ., for instance. i have about a minute. would you for instance. i have about a minute. would you see for instance. i have about a minute. would you see that for instance. i have about a minute. would you see that as for instance. i have about a minute. would you see that as a for instance. i have about a minute. would you see that as a red - for instance. i have about a minute. would you see that as a red line? . would you see that as a red line? would you see that as a red line? would you see that as a red line? would you like