this free stuff. she fabricated this story. it s not the data. the data backs your point. she is zero. yes. i don t think that s the point. to my mind the amazing thing about elizabeth warren is despite all of this she is number 3 in the polls. she has been eating into bernie sanders. do you think that s because of the are the candidates? no, i think it s i have a plan. she has policy. she burned out a niche for herself. she as a website where you can go on and see how much of your student debt would be erased underer plan. that s impressive. everybody wants to go back to the dna problem. you do. no.
this free stuff. she fabricated this story. it s not the data. the data backs your point. she is zero. yes. i don t think that s the point. to my mind the amazing thing about elizabeth warren is despite all of this she is number 3 in the polls. she has been eating into bernie sanders. do you think that s because of the are the candidates? no, i think it s i have a plan. she has policy. she burned out a niche for herself. she as a website where you can go on and see how much of your student debt would be erased underer plan. that s impressive. everybody wants to go back to the dna problem. you do. no.
after the fact you can then make connections that go way, way out. that s why we re collecting so much dna. talk about a problem. the dna problem. do you know within 10 or 15 years i predict every child born in america and perhaps in the world will have their dna taken at birth. there will be a universal dna bank and we don t have a firewall between using dna for personal identification as a fingerprint and looking into a person s dna. their genetics how long they re going to live. what diseases they re likely to get, whether they have propensities to violence and crime. dna is the key the government could use to unlock all of our privacy and the supreme court has not been focused on creating protections against that. where is that line, though, alan, between our constitutional right to be protected against search and seizure of our property and information and the government s necessary right to obtain information to stop bad
connections that go way, way t out. talk about a dna problem, in ten years, i predict every child will have dna taken at birth, there will be a universal dna bank, don t have a fire wall between using dna as identification, for example, a fingerprint, and looking into a dna, genetics, finding out how long they are likely to live, whether they have propensity to violence and crime. dna is the key the government to use to unlock all our privacy, and the supreme court has not been focused on creating protections against that. where is that line between our constitutional right to be protected against search and seizure of property and information and the government s necessary right to obtain information to stop bad people? justice scalia and
after the fact you can then make connections that go way, way out. that s why we re collecting so much dna. talk about a problem. the dna problem. do you know within 10 or 15 years i predict every child born in america and perhaps in the world will have their dna taken at birth. there will be a universal dna bank and we don t have a firewall between using dna for personal identification as a fingerprint and looking into a person s dna. their genetics how long they re going to live. what diseases they re likely to get, whether they have propensities to violence and crime. dna is the key the government could use to unlock all of our privacy and the supreme court has not been focused on creating protections against that. where is that line, though, alan, between our constitutional right to be protected against search and seizure of our property and information and the government s necessary right to obtain information to stop bad