ticket and internal rivalries and she did not stop and talk to reporters and she was deliberately not trying to overshadow hillary clinton. it seems leak she s really gone out and doing her own thing, but partly trying to fix the mistakes early on. the dna issue and the whole her whole response to pocahontas and the president deriding her claim of the native american background and this was a question asked not by a reporter and it was by a civilian. this is what happened. when i first ran for public office the first time was in 2012, and the republicans honed in on this part of my history, and thought they could make a lot of hay out of it. a lot of racial slurs and a lot of ugly stuff that went on, and so my decision was i was going to put it all out there. was it a mistake, though?
lot of tests. the likability question was sort of the first one. i saw her this week in the senate and asked her whether she thought this was sexism. she didn t want to go into the issue. but that s something she s not going to be able to do this entire race. so there will be difficult situations that come up. a lot of people in washington were pretty dismayed with how she even some of her supporters, with how she handled the dna issue. she s going to be tested again and again. that s what running for president is. part of the likability came about when she released this video on instagram. hold on a sec. i m going to get me a beer. hey. my husband bruce is now in here. you want a beer? i ll pass on the beer for now. you sure? so this is my sweetie.
way that they would have wanted to be identified had they still been living, joe. and this dna issue really adding another layer of complexity to the investigation. and we still haven t gotten to the cause. thank you so much for that, stephanie elam. we ll check back with you. we ll be right back. everything your family touches sticks with them. make sure the germs they bring home don t stick around. use clorox disinfecting products. because no one kills germs better than clorox.
assault. he s found not to he wasn t even charged. but based on what goes on at the university of california berkeley. that s just irresponsible. no, i m statistics are what they are. but that doesn t mean that jameis sexually assaulted this young lady. i don t think anybody here i agree with that. no one here knows what happened. but what we re saying is when someone comes forward with serious allegations of a crime that the police are supposed to investigate. they didn t even look at the surveillance video to find out who she left with. and they would have been able to identify him even sooner and get his dna. which they later found did match. so i think that the dna issue is a red herring. he admits to consensual sex. right. but there is videotape of the encounter, then wouldn t that prove that it did or did not happen? and that was deleted evidence because the police didn t do their job from david, from my perspective, from the perspective here of let s sa
assume or allege that jameis winston is guilty of sexual assault. he s found not to he wasn t even charged. but based on what goes on at the university of california berkeley. that s just irresponsible. no, i m statistics are what they are. but that doesn t mean that jameis sexually assaulted this young lady. i don t think anybody here i agree with that. no one here knows what happened. but what we re saying is when someone comes forward with serious allegations of a crime that the police are supposed to investigate. they didn t even look at the surveillance video to find out who she left with. and they would have been able to identify him even sooner and get his dna. which they later found did match. so i think that the dna issue is a red herring. he admits to consensual sex. right. but there is videotape of the encounter, then wouldn t that prove that it did or did not happen? and that was deleted evidence because the police didn t do their job from david, f