or when did it come out in the western mainstream media that the most popular at western social media outlets like twitter and facebook are chalked up, are chock full of former f, b i n, c. i a officials and work closely with the intelligence community. um, when did they speak up about that and how do we know that s the case? well, because after elan must forked over $44000000000.00 to buy twitter and got his hands on the company s internal documents, he started releasing them through select journalists, blowing the whistle on the practices that pre dated his ownership of the platform. interestingly, it s not own, it s only now when musk is revealing the truth about the kind of narrative gatekeeping that went on involving western intelligence officials that these european officials want to get the e. you want you to get mosque on a leash now, why isn t the german official jiggled asking the you to look into the new study just released by the university of maine s, concluding
cross sucking security guarantees. i m joined by my guess. the boy mileage in washington, he is a blogger, and calm is in quebec. we have dmitri last caught us. he is a lawyer and freelance journalist and, and we re thing, we crossed anthony webber. he is an independent political commentator. all right, gentlemen, cross huck rules and effect, that means you can jump in any time you want and i always appreciated a boy, let me go to you 1st in the imperial city. um, this idea of indivisibility of security has been quite lost. and ever since the end of the cold war, because it was the hallmark of the helsinki process, and nato is just thrown that into the wind. and i would say that speak the in, that is the be the result is a conflict. do we have in ukraine, though? no one in the west seems to want to use that logic, but it was the west and the soviet union that came up with that logic that kept the peace in europe during the cold war. so what are they missing? go ahead and bouc
but we are fighting. that s why i m fat. we ll fighting for the right. so i, we do not consider the right to self determination actually applies to the juggle. since i don t the question, no self determination of the legal advice we have received is actually the chickens . we re not and all not a people for me, it s done to move on and see what we can do. a full the tumbler said committee to return back home. there is no support from the united nation. i commission advocate united nish. i don t care about juggling people ah ah hello and welcome to cross stock where all things are considered. i m peter lavelle, russian. the west survived the cold war because both recognized and practice the concept of indivisibility of security. one country should not attempt to attain security at the expense of another country. this is exactly what the west has done against russia to the point of claiming russia has no right to any security guarantees. ah cross sucking security guarantees. i
that into the wind and i would say that speed, and that is to be the result is the conflict that we have in ukraine, though no one in the west seems to want to use that logic, but it was the west and the soviet union that came up with that logic that kept the peace in europe during the cold war. so what are they missing? go ahead and the butcher. well this you are quite correct that this was entered, the call ended up preventing the cold war from turning hot. unfortunately, it was red con, from history and ninety s amid this whole end of history, triumphalism that, that became the ideology this year in washington. and a healthy prostate basically became a conveyor belt for the us to brow beat, other countries into doing its bidding. and this doctrine that wasn t quite so clearly formulated. but they basically said that the only sovereign truly sovereign country in the world is us. and everybody else has to do what they re told, or else. and we saw what or else meant in 1999.
it s just thrown that into the wind and i would say that speed and that is the reason the result is the conflict. we have been ukraine, though. no one in the west seems to want to use that logic, but it was the west and the soviet union that came up with that logic that kept the peace in europe during the cold war. so what are they missing? go ahead and the butcher. well this, do you are quite correct that this was entered, the call ended up preventing the cold war from turning hot. unfortunately, it was red con, from history in the ninety s, amid this whole end of history, triumphalism that, that became the ideology to sure. and washington. and the helsinki process basically became a conveyor belt for the us to browbeat other countries into doing it, speeding and this doctor and it wasn t quite so clearly formulated. but they basically said that the only sovereign truly sovereign country in the war is the us . and everybody else has to do what they re told, or else. and we s