comparemela.com

Latest Breaking News On - District of wisconsin the court - Page 1 : comparemela.com

Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action Involving Persons or Entities Who Purchased Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc Common Stock from January 26, 2017 through November 19, 2018

Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action Involving Persons or Entities Who Purchased HRG Group, Inc Common Stock from January 26, 2017 to July 13, 2018

ABS Global v Cytonome/St, LLC: Mootness and Preserving the Argument for Vacatur | Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P C

To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog: In 2017, Cytonome filed suit in the Western District of Wisconsin (“the District Court”), accusing ABS of infringing six of its patents, including US Patent No. 8,529,161 (“the ’161 patent”). Subsequently, in October 2017, ABS filed for inter partes review (“IPR”) of the ’161 patent, and the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“the Board”) issued a decision in April 2019 that invalidated certain claims of the ’161 patent while also finding that ABS had failed to demonstrate several other claims as unpatentable. Shortly after the Board’s decision, the District Court granted in part a motion for summary judgment by ABS, finding that ABS’s products did not infringe any of the ’161 patent’s claims. Nevertheless, nearly two months later, ABS appealed the Board’s decision. At the beginning of January, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“the CAFC”) issued a precedential decision in

© 2024 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.