paula reid is outfront . let me start with barrack s plans to fight the charges. some thought okay we ll go with the charges to try to get them to cooperate and give information on other things and this is part of a pressure campaign but he doesn t seem to be indicating he ll cooperate. not at all. this is a guy with the money, the resources to fight these charges. i spoke with sources close to this case and i m told barrack is not expected to cooperate in any on going investigation related to the former president. now, we ve also learned that prosecutors in manhattan had examined barrack s role as chairman of the inauguration committee but that federal investigation has been dormant since last year and nobody was charged. interestingly, barrack was deposed last year related to a civil suit by the attorney general here in the district of colombia. and in that deposition, he was actually asked about his dealings with the trump organization, which is of course, under investigation and
opposition of the federal government. the one thing i echo everything that he said.ry the one thing i did not say and i have to plug this as a resident of the district of colombia, i did not hear support for making the district of columbia the 51st state. we re not really a true and robust discussion about the statest of american democracy until we re a talking about makg d.c. the 51st state and puerto rico and other territories they wanted. the i know we want it near d.c. that s fundamental to our rite right to be considered as full citizens of this country. do you think the justice department waging this legal fight against the state measures that are taking place to by some accounts suppress the vote? do you think it will have a significant impact? it is enough? if not, why not? zblfr i don t think that it s enough. it is absolutely important. it is critical. we re doubling the size of the voting rights division in the department of justice. that s important. while we saw during t
Monday, February 15, 2021
Last month, the mayor of the District of Columbia signed a near-total ban on noncompete provisions used by D.C. employers to protect their business interests. We have previously written about a possible federal noncompete ban and indications that states are moving in the same direction. The new D.C. law will raise a number of questions that may not be resolved until courts sort through many difficult enforcement issues arising out of the language. The bill has been sent to Congress for required approval (because D.C. is not a state) and is expected to take effect in mid-March.
Legal Disclaimer
You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review s (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.
La playlist de 10 grandes éxitos para recordar a Tito Rojas, el gallo de la salsa infobae.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from infobae.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.