You dont have that direct evidence and you need this indirect evidence. Know your honor first of all i strongly deny the General Assembly engaged in discrimination but even in that discrimination case you have to prove the injury element is stronger when you have her results to when you are trying to prove her results test or maybe you dont think it does. I would have thought that was part and parcel to what you are saying in other words you are talking about the injury and the injury you have to show has to be stronger to coast you cant point it at any evidence of intentional. Your honor i have to apologize in answering this question because there is not a lot of guidance by the Supreme Court on these cases. So what we can only do is we can look at the cases and look what sort of slows clues we can discern from the cases. We know the constitutional vote you still have to prove discriminatory results to get that the case but you also have to prepurposes from a nation. I was just trying
Election. She works three jobs to make ends meet. On meet. On election day she did not know where her correct polling place west so she voted close to her job. Even if they had told her she was a voting in the incorrect precinct she would not have had time to go to the correct precinct because it is there be penalties of being later to work. The same the one in washington. Thank you very much honor. [inaudible] i am good morning your honor. I am here on behalf of the North Carolina state conference of the naacp and other plaintiffs in that case. Many of whom are here in the courtroom today. I will primarily address the section to claim but hope to, briefly in the racial intent. We do, the North Carolina double its naacp is looking at both the section to racial claim. Youll open your comments will focus on section two . Yes i plan to primarily focus on results. Your honors, the plaintiff, after being with you in 2014 went to trial, to trials and in those trials we applied the framework
Below are noteworthy False Claims Act (FCA) decisions from the third quarter of 2023. The main issues in the cases are: Materiality. The Fourth Circuit.