We will and with a brief rebuttal from mr. Flynns counsel and the council of United States. Please proceed. Thank you chief judge, may it please the court, general flynn is a defendant without a prosecutor, and litigation without controversy between the parties to the case. Instead of granting dismissal as required as a matter of law, John Sullivan denied defense motions, appointed mr. Gleason to usurp the job of the prosecutor, raised perjury but as iter his head, was noted, the job of United States attorney is occupied. Adding the unconstitutional burdens of process to punish michael flynn, John Sullivan discarded any semblance of the adjudicator. As a cornerstone of any system of justice worth the label. Required. Gs are judge sullivans position for rehearing must be flatly denied with language that a judge has no injury or standing to seek relief in this court. Sullivan has invested himself in the prosecution of general flynn, it is mandated disqualification for the glaring appeara
Protesters tell leaders, welcome to hell. We have world coverage. Some harsh words coming out of germany. In seoul, Second Quarter profits should be coming up. Betty we are watching the g20 meeting in hamburg. We have will have insights for washington and across asia, what to expect from those talks and that meeting between putin and trump. This is daybreak asia, live from bloombergs usn asian headquarters. I am betty liu in new york, just after 7 00 p. M. After 7 00is just a. M. Here in hong kong. I am yvonne man. For markets, the stress has been in fixed income. Hawkish talk has brought stocks lower. Check out this bloomberg. You can see the tally what we saw overnight. Classes sold off, in tandem, for the first time in 10 days. This is the s p 500 etf and the treasury bond etf. Last time we saw these moves was 2013. Which has some wondering, is this the start of a taper tantrum . Betty which is exactly what the fed wants to avoid. Have been so careful to say the right things to the
Restrooms for separate dormitories. What concerns me a little bit is not to be ambiguous. To give a line of questions which restroom does the individual use . , your honor that is a great question. We would like to hear period answer ruth like to hear your answer because then it goes the other way. Than that depends on the condition. That is an accurate. 9 of the uterus transplants for women. The gender identity it isnt like the categories of male and female to correspond with internal organs or chromosomes estimate the question is i think it will reduce that consistent with the gender identity within all aspects of their lives but again it is important to remember the structure of title ix is that Congress Wants to make the distinctions because the sponsor said when they ask what about restrooms they did not say dont worry they said the agency can use those at their discretion. That entire statute is structured over what sports teams can day tryout for for those segregated restrooms i
Because there were not looking for evidence of a legislative intent to create a right to judicial review. Your position is thats already there under the apa. Unless there is evidence of a judicial intent, of a congressional intention to preclude judicial review . Thats exactly right. Thats the presumption created by the apa. The way that your honor articulated it is the way the Supreme Court has articulated it time and again. Thats the governments burden to show by clear and convincing evidence that congress intended to preclude our claims, not our burden to demonstrate that congress intended to create them. If i may, ill move on to the merits of our statutory claim. As i said before, our first claim is that section 215 simply does not apply to call records. In the same statute that congress enacted section 215, in 2001, it added a provision to the stored Communications Act prohibiting the government from acquiring phone records. It created i exceptions to that prohibition. But section
June of 2015 is the better path for the community, not necessarily your clients, the community at large. Changing hearts and minds happens through democracy much more effectively than it happens through court decisions. I understand, judge, but i represent four couples. Their kids deserve two parents. They deserve them today and thats and they are entitled to those based on these notions of due process and equal protection. And especially when you look at the movement thats occurred. This is similar to the loving situation, which by the way, was a recognition case. I mean, that couple moved to d. C. , got married, then came back to virginia and were prosecuted because virginia wouldnt recognize the d. C. Marriage. At the time of the decision in 1967, there were 15 states that had repealed the ban on interracial marriage. There was momentum going in their favor, but the Supreme Court still struck down their prosecution. There was still 16 states that prohibited interracial marriage. Tha