the language that was being used. but it would have been that internal interagency process that then resulted in the intelligence community assessment. that is the traditional way that these assessments are drafted, are coordinated, and are published. without even getting into the final conclusion, if there were other evidence though that indicated contrary, should that have been listed or not? you re dealing with a lot of information when you put together an intelligence assessment. it comes down to a distillation process. and as you know, there were two products that were produced an unclassified version, and a highly classified version. and the attempt was to try to include in that highly classified version all of the relevant and pertinent information that needed to be in there in order to undergird the judgments contained. was 100% of all of the information available put into that highly classified one?