type of an agreement where we may not impose the tariff being proposed? the end game should be a lowering of tariffs on both sides across the world. but the united states must lead by example. and the united states is a great city on a shining hill, the beacon of freedom and liberty. and that applies to economic freedom as well. that s the best way rather than a highly destructive trade war which many in europe are keen top implement. i hope the administration will seek other solutions to the current situation. eric: as always, good to see you. arthel: the immigration issue will heat up again as lawmakers return to work this week. can republicans make progress with dissention in the ranks? a joyous occasion tinged with
anti-russian defend liberty coalition, are in vocal opposition. recently, a move by the ruling party to sign a deal with russia s gazprom for all georgia s oil needs, has caused dissention. we meet at sophia melnikovas a much-loved bistro for the most loved, perhaps most iconic georgian dish, khinkali. i understand that georgia is not releasing, but looking around, compared to 2008, life looks good. there s money in the streets, shiny new cars. sophia: no, well, the thing is that, yes, things have changed. after the collapse of the soviet union, georgia was the country that suffered the most among the former soviet republic s economically. and our economy totally collapsed, corruption, like,
the president is being who he has always been. he has always believed in bringing all different ideas and inputs and individuals to the table. he always looks for disagreement, dissention, he doesn t need 100% agreement. he just needs an honest conversation. this president convened that historic meeting in the cabinet room on live tv. america saw the president talking to a bipartisan group of individual on the issue of immigration. fast forward you had democrats voting no to a continuing resolution, and they voted no to keeping the government open and military funding and no to the military wives getting the money they need. they voted no to the border patrol agents because they are saying yes to daca recipients who crossed that bored illegal many of them. that s an issue the president
the president is being who he has always been. he has always believed in bringing all different ideas and inputs and individuals to the table. he always looks for disagreement, dissention, he doesn t need 100% agreement. he just needs an honest conversation. this president convened that historic meeting in the cabinet room on live tv. america saw the president talking to a bipartisan group of individual on the issue of immigration. fast forward you had democrats voting no to a continuing resolution, and they voted no to keeping the government open and military funding and no to the military wives getting the money they need. they voted no to the border patrol agents because they are saying yes to daca recipients who crossed that bored illegal many of them. that s an issue the president
republican lunchtime meal to talk tax reform. president trump desperately trying to pass the tax cut. if you re a republican rooting for this to succeed, the problem is his effort is starting to look like the failed attempts at repealing obamacare. you have dissention in the republican congress, and a president who doesn t have a whole lot to rail against. what the president says and what the republican plan does are polar opposites. so for instance, the president said this is not a plan for the rich. blatantly untrue. then he said at the heart of our plan is a tax cut for everyday working americans. untruth number two. when they talk about getting rid of state and local deductability. when they talk about limiting 14ks. when they talk about limiting the mortgage deduction, those