comparemela.com

Latest Breaking News On - Dispute resolution act - Page 4 : comparemela.com

PHC rejects plea against law on alternate dispute resolution - Pakistan

In the petition, lawyer Fawad Afzal Khan had pleaded that the KP Alternate Dispute Resolution Act, 2020, was in conflict with the Constitution. DawnNewsTV/File PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court on Thursday dismissed a petition seeking to declare a provincial law on alternate dispute resolution illegal and unconstitutional. A bench consisting of Justice Lal Jan Khattak and Justice Shakeel Ahmad announced a short order for the purpose after the completion of arguments by advocate general Shumail Ahmad Butt and petitioner’s counsel Noor Alam Khan. The detailed verdict will be released afterwards. In the petition, lawyer Fawad Afzal Khan had pleaded that the KP Alternate Dispute Resolution Act, 2020, was in conflict with the Constitution and that the executive had encroached on the functions of the judiciary through it.

Three different laws in vogue for alternate dispute resolution - Newspaper

The Khyber Pakhtunkhwa government on May 20 issued a notification for enforcement of the KP Alternate Dispute Resolution Act, 2020, and rules framed thereunder in six of the seven tribal districts, which were merged with the province in 2018. With the enforcement of the Act in the said six districts, including South Waziristan, Kurram, Orakzai, Khyber, Mohmand and Bajaur, now three different laws have been in vogue in the province for alternate dispute resolution (ADR). While the KP Police Act, 2017, provides for setting up of dispute resolution councils (DRCs), the KP Local Government Act, 2013, envisages establishment of mediation council for settlement of civil disputes.

Key considerations for investing in Australia – Australian Competition and Consumer Law - Government, Public Sector

Anti-Dumping Commission Key issues for new entrants to consider An onshore importer or supplier of goods manufactured offshore can become directly liable for loss and damage suffered in Australia as the deemed manufacturer of those goods. Knowledge of how this can occur assists in: Ensuring onshore entities are structured appropriately, to minimise risk; and, Avoiding the onshore importer or supplier becoming deemed as the manufacturer for the purposes of liability. The use of a corporate entity to do business in Australia does not afford officeholders and other individuals involved in the business protection from personal liability. Individuals can be personally liable for a breach of the Australian Consumer Law if

© 2024 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.