nature of the impeachment proceedings in the house? thank you, mr. chief justice, members of the senate. absolutely you should take that into account. that s dispositive. that should end it. based on the statements that we heard the last time from our friends on the democratic side. that s a reason why you shouldn t have an impeachment. speaker pelosi was right when she said that. unfortunately she didn t follow her own advice. we ve never been in a situation where we have the impeachment of a president in an election year with the goal of removing the president from the ballot. as i ve said before, that is the most massive election interference we ve ever witnessed. it s domestic election
understand that not just if trump actually engaged with foreign governments, but actually if he didn t. so i think pointing to that as an opening, that that is how the democrats are going into this, it s how a lot of members of congress are going into this conversation is to prove the dispositive. if he didn t do it, it was important to see that too. so at least trying point to that in good intentions, pointing to good intentions can always be a good strategy. and, you know, some people out there that are just so wound up about it because they re like there s nothing funny about what s happening in our country right now. but it s thanksgiving and, hey, this time next year there will be a new president-elect or we re going to have this discussion about four more years, one way or another, it s going to happen just like that. all right. darryl, i want to ask you, why did you write this book? i wrote the book just because we know that polarization is at a high point in america. the bo
want to ask, things you might want to follow up on. so the congress could use it in the same way, of course. these documents are heavily redacted so they might not be as helpful to congress as they were to the mueller team. nevertheless, this is going to tell them where to look. and as the ambassador said, help to establish a timeline, how far back does some of this conduct go, and who might know more about it. so it can be helpful. i m not sure it will be dispositive, but it certainly can be helpful. and one of the revelations in the fbi documents, it repeals that the republican national committee, the republican party knew that the timing that would be involved in the releasing of the emails, democratic emails during the campaign, said the rnc also indicated they knew the timing of the upcoming releases. gates did not specify who at the rnc knew this information. gates said the only nonpublic information the rnc had was
prove was an attempt to benefit his son. it s a crime to confer a benefit in exchange for something of value or to withhold and extort money for something of value that in this case would benefit his son. e john s great reporting, not just the documents. he was the first to interview the fired prosecutor, shokin. shokin told ul the washington post and i quoted today on foxnews.com that they were closing in a on hunter biden. and shokin says it was joe biden s extortion that caused his firing. that s not just relevant. it may be dispositive of potential charges against joe biden and this president donald trump has a constitutional duty to uphold the law, enforce the law, as i mentioned last night, failure to do so is really sort of a breach of his duty.
john s documents tomorrow will prove was an attempt to benefit his son. it s a crime to confer a benefit in exchange for something of value or to withhold and extort money for something of value that in this case would benefit his son. john s great reporting, not just the documents. he was the first interview to interview the fired prosecutor, shulkin. shulkin told the washington post and i quoted today on foxnews.com that they were closing in a hunter biden. and shulkin says it was joe biden s extortion that caused his firing. that s not just relevant. it may be dispositive of potential charges against joe biden and this president donald trump has no constitutional duty to uphold the law, enforce the law, as i mentioned last night, failure to