their re-over two decades combined effect and hence why this group is bringing in case to the education department and says this violates your regulations, which ban bandies disparate im ban disparate impact policies. whites do disproportionately benefit based on all the evidence. paul: kim, the education department would bring a case against harvard? i mean, that politically would not be, harvard is big supporter was this administration. what do you think? something he might be do? it will and might be a populous winner and the president is trying very hard to appeal to blue collar and working class americans as he gears up for reelection and what better organization to beat up on than an elite university but
secretary karine jean-pierre on tuesday. the president was clear that he made sure legacy admissions hold back our ability to build diverse student bodies. paul: we re back with kim, allysia and bill. allysia, what do you make of this investigation? particularly is there a legal case here potentially? i don t think there s a legal case and it was filed with the department of education and they cannot bring a legal case under their theory and it s a desperate impact paul: explain disparate impact. it is therefore evidence of discrimination and now the supreme court is an act of truth. paul: that somebody discriminated? that s right. the supreme court rejected this