of bias in my professional actions. jesse: you know what this remind me of? jim acosta at cnn. he s yelling at the president, he s investigating the president, he hates the president, disparages the president all the time. then he has the gall to say i m non-biased. i don t have any bias in my reporting. my personal bias has never affected my work. this is why i like being an opinion writer. i don t have to pretend i don t have opinions. the reality is, when you watch peter strzok and he s reading those texts, it doesn t take a rocket scientist to know how dismissive they are of trump voters and exactly what he meant when he said them. when he tries to justify them and at the same time says i m honorable and i never tell a
of bias in my professional actions. jesse: you know what this remind me of? jim acosta at cnn. he s yelling at the president, he s investigating the president, he hates the president, disparages the president all the time. then he has the gall to say i m non-biased. i don t have any bias in my reporting. my personal bias has never affected my work. this is why i like being an opinion writer. i don t have to pretend i don t have opinions. the reality is, when you watch peter strzok and he s reading those texts, it doesn t take a rocket scientist to know how dismissive they are of trump voters and exactly what he meant when he said them. when he tries to justify them and at the same time says i m
disparages statement would be read by people around the world as well as widely reported and that ms. clifford would be subjected to threats of violence, economic harm, and reputational damage. the lawsuit seeks at least $75,000 in damages. joining us from capitol reporter for the hill, molly hooper. let s talk about marco rubio, seeming to back pedal of course on the gop tax cut which is is surprising to say the least. what do you make of his latest comments on all of this? ? well, he s kind of back pedaling but only back pedaling from his vote because he was one of the concerns that the leadership had in terms of whether he would support it because he was skeptical as to the corporate tax cuts would really have big benefits for the economy. and as we re approaching the elections we haven t seen
knew this was going to be politicized. we knew we weren t going to be able to have a full investigation. remember, this is not just about collusion. this is about what the russians did with wikileaks. this is about what the russians probed in terms of our electoral machinery. and a commission would also investigate what the obama administration did, including what the fbi did or did not do during this situation. that s the kind of investigation we need, and we re not getting it because the president has decided that his interest as he perceives them, are more important than the national interest. that is a huge mistake that we re going to pay for down the road. evan mcmullin, you are, i believe, that we know of, the only former cia operative in our conversation right now. can you talk to me about the sort of ethos at the cia when you have an intelligence product that during the transition, donald trump disparages that the
and that this broad policy disparages adherence to that faith in the same way that the individual residents of san francisco county felt disparaged when the board of supervisors adopted this resolution saying that the cardinal of that diocese was acting in a terrible and un-american way by refusing to refer adoptees to same-sex couples. so what is the difference? i think we have two key differences, one, that was religious speech, this is not. the basis of religion in an operation does not distinguish on the basis of religion. and that explicitly religious message was directed at the community where the plaintiffs were a member. this operates with aliens abroad, so the way that the plaintiff is trying to get around that, oh, well, it sends a message. it sends a message to all