could cut gas demand, cut bills and cut carbon emissions. the answer is and try to keep that as consistent to move cut carbon emissions. the answer is to move on cut carbon emissions. the answer is to move on all those fronts. yes, we ve to move on all those fronts. yes, we ve got to move on all those fronts. yes, as possible in the year but because we ve got to to move on all those fronts. yes, we ve got to do what we can to stabilise we ve got to do what we can to stabilise the supply, but the real our consumption weights heavily answer stabilise the supply, but the real answer is stabilise the supply, but the real towards winter because that s when answer is to move forward on renewables, move forward on energy we got the heating, that when we are efficiency. renewables, move forward on energy in the home, using more electricity efficiency, and above all have a plan efficiency, and above all have a lan. efficiency, and above all have a ian, , , efficiency, and
what prompted it? the it is expected that a £300 million what it has found and in the sense what prompted it? what it has found and in the sense what prompted it? the study was done takeover of newcastle united will in short to check takeover of newcastle united will what prompted it? the study was done in short to check whether what prompted it? the study was done in short to check whether or what prompted it? the study was done in short to check whether or not - take place later, after an agreement what prompted it? the study was done in short to check whether or not the i in short to check whether or not the spurious studies being done into was reached over the terms. the ivermectin which is a horse premier league had previously raised concerns about the saudi s group to dewormer, that has picked up some speedin dewormer, that has picked up some speed in certain circles in the united states in particular, but the state. a lot of fans in the city actually in latin america and
it s the same way the people cite the internet when they say they re, quote, doing their own research about the vaccine. oh, i read this thing it does this and does that. that s the point of what we call disinformation. not information. it s disinformation. it releases false information into the atmosphere as a kind of pollutant or not even false. it might be narrowly true but just distracting. and that pollutant mixwise the other molecules and information in the air and becomes increasingly hard for people to distinguish because we breed all the bad air and the good all mixed together. the disinformation doesn t have to be persuasive. it doesn t have to look competent or correct. just look what s going on in maricopa county. it just has to be out there. that s it. that s the point of the arizona audit. and it is the latest in a long line of disinformation coming from the right and particularly from donald trump. because given this, that is a man who understands the power of disinforma
problems with misinformation issues with people and including leaders and government leaders. let s come up with a policy about this. and again throughout this book we show that facebook really waits until after the problem has already started to try to come up with the policies. it s very reactive rather than proactive. now that we have your audio. let me stick with you and get another question to you. particularly because i want to know about where the solution lies. jen psaki, the white house press secretary said during a briefing this week that 12 accounts on facebook are responsible for about two thirds of the vaccine misinformation on the platform. and if you re wondering who they are, we have a list. they come from a report called the disinformation doesn t. will call you the 12 are. so if you have any of these 12 in these facebook accounts of people you re following, maybe tonight s the night to do digital hygiene and consider whether you want to keep following them. how much
relevant or related to our national security. we have a check and balance responsibility under the constitution. and when i raise my right hand and take my oath of office at the beginning of the term, i took that exceedingly seriously. and wish chairman nunes would too, sir. so what s the overall impact of these allegations? nothing. it s distraction, deflection. it doesn t matter because it is a political campaign. it is not a matter of the legal defense. i don t think it is going to deter robert mueller in the slightest. i don t think it ever has. i don t think it s changed his due diligence, his professionalism, his trajectory whatsoever. he s after the truth full stop, period. and all this campaigning on their part, all the spinning all the disinformation doesn t affect his behavior whatsoever. some of your republican colleagues, they re using this as another opportunity to push for a second counsel