subpoenas pat cipolline. the witness talked about him. every one has been talking about that. pat cipollone is the former president s white house counsel, a key witness to what was going on inside the white house the days before, the time during and after the attack on the united states capitol. we have been trying to get him to answer they have been trying i should say to get him to answer more questions after previously sitting behind closed doors in april. the committee has been saying it s trying to obtain evidence that cipollone is, quote, uniquely positioned to testify but he has declined to cooperate further leaving the panel no choice but to issue the subpoena. and we have heard some of what the evidence was for ourselves. pat cipollone s name coming up again and again and again as i said in testimony before the committee. watch. mr. cipollone said something to the effect of please make sure we don t go up to the capitol, cassidy, keep in touch with me. we re goin
abortion rights still enact a decades old ban? what happens with abortion pills? where can they and can t they be mailed? what about the politics, can a republican congress with a republican president now move to restrict all abortions across the can country? what can democrats do to reverse this, if anything? at least ten states quickly moved to implement laws effectively banning abortions since friday, some happened with trigger laws, another five states expected to enact further laws limiting abortion and all 26 states have laws that indicate they could outlaw or set extreme limits on the procedure. there were some protests across the country over the weekend, they were largely peaceful. and as some states move to restrict abortion rights others are taking steps to protect access and funding. some major companies are pledging to provide support not just for employees, in some cases they re saying they re going to provide support for dependents in states where abortions a
life in america. a dream that came to a tragic end with dozens of others in the back of a sweltering tractor-trailer. announcer: live from cnn center, this is cnn newsroom with michael holmes. and we begin in ukraine, where a u.s.-supplied advanced weapon is reportedly starting to gain some traction on the battlefield. a senior u.s. defense official says ukraine has used the himaz multiple rocket launchers to take out russian rockets and other target. four of those are in use in ukraine, four more on their way. meanwhile, president zelenskyy accusing russia of terrorism following friday s missile strikes on a residential area near odesa. at least 21 people were killed, 40 others wounded. this as the u.s. announces a new batch of military aid for ukraine including those anti-aircraft missile systems. mr. zelenskyy saying the equipment will give ukraine a much much-needed boost. translator: i am especially grateful to the united states of america and personally to biden
trump bomb shells. at that time january 6th hearings yesterday a star witness no one ever heard of testified about something she didn t see which right there makes her testimony as la jets mate as smoke signals from liz warren. so what s the gist? that is then president donald trump was being driven back to the white house after the january 6th rally and demanded the car pull over so he could snack on an injured dog on the side of the road. yeah. it was a pekingese which he then sleuthered in ketchup which he devoured with his hands. don jr. was in the back seat. she was told that anyway. actually she was told on the way to the rally donald trump stripped naked declared himself the king and all of shakespeare plays on his smith correspond rona processor he bothered from his head adolf hitler who isn t really dead but lives in a shampoo bottle in mar-a-lago pool house. maybe that ace bit much. but her claims are even much believable. she claims she was told that trump actuall
his prayer was protected by the first amendment. he joined fox, for his first interview since the big win. if you had to do this all over again, you would? yes, i would. i would think a couple times before i do the whole seven years and losing the first five times, but 100% worth it knowing i fought for the right thing and ended up winning and knowing justice is done and freedoms are good. kayleigh, justice gorsuch saying the free exercise and free speech clause of the first amendment protect expression like mr. kennedy. that is what the constitution said, this is the first win for this coach, congratulations to them and victory for people of faith everywhere. let me put this in context. in 1962 and 63, the supreme court evicted god from schools. from that moment on, what happened are series of defeats for people of faith. 1952 case, majority cited today, the case said we agree the state may not establish religion of secularism in the sense of oshg posing or showing h