compliance, obeying the tax law. that s right. this does not have the overtones of improper influence of the right-wing billionaires going around alito and thomas in the company of leonard legal, the billionaire s court court fixer. but it plays right into the problem of people not telling the truth about what actually went on, so that the public can be satisfied that it complies to the tax laws, he complies with the ethics laws, and with a disclosure laws. so, there s not even an effort to make a disclosure. it is just omerta. senator sheldon whitehouse, rachel referred to you as banging your head against the wall on this subject for years now. we thank you for that effort. you have brought light to this in a way that no one else has. thank you very much for joining us tonight. thank you, sir. thank you. and coming up moments before
recuse themselves from critical decisions that are worth billions of dollars from people who are befriending them on vacations. that has got to come to an end. there is one person who could end it before the sun sets today. chief justice john roberts. it s time for him to step up, and announced that there will be a code of ethics for the supreme court, and the disclosure laws will apply, and they will follow at least the same rules as every other federal judge in america. not doing so is really at the expense of the reputation of the court. yes, and don t have them voting he said into institutionalist who has at times fiercely try to protect the reputation of the court. so you think that he would do that. i do wonder senator. how much power do you have? what is your jurisdiction in the united states congress to pass that sort of code of ethics? people don t understand, but you know, the supreme court didn t used to be as powerful as it is. in fact it used to sit in the
washington from a company with the matter said on thursday. his spokespeople are saying this is going to wash out. he is find the denying the allegations for this is not his first rodeo on this. that is true. his spokespeople the senator himself said there s something to this for there s an investigation that is playing out. you mention the fact he s cleared in 2015 of similar charges in terms of gifts being exchanged and things like that. but there is a clear line in terms of whether the center is guilty or not based on disclosure laws and based on was there anything traded for that and terms of legislation or policy changes in things like that. i think that process is clear it will clear the center just edited 2015. shannon: had a mistrial on corruption trial charges than before the d.o.j. tried and they dismissed all the charges. so charlie he said this is another one the cases it s not
washington from a company with the matter said on thursday. his spokespeople are saying this is going to wash out. he is find the denying the allegations for this is not his first rodeo on this. that is true. his spokespeople the senator himself said there s something to this for there s an investigation that is playing out. you mention the fact he s cleared in 2015 of similar charges in terms of gifts being exchanged and things like that. but there is a clear line in terms of whether the center is guilty or not based on disclosure laws and based on was there anything traded for that and terms of legislation or policy changes in things like that. i think that process is clear it will clear the center just edited 2015. shannon: had a mistrial on corruption trial charges than before the d.o.j. tried and they dismissed all the charges. so charlie he said this is another one the cases it s not
charge being levelled by house republicans that they made millions in payments from foreign entities in new bank records. how substantive are these allegations? well, i think that people have been profiting off of their family and politics since the republican was created. we saw it with billy carter and roger clinton. the list goes on and on. the question is, is hunter biden anything different than any of those guys, including jared kushner, who has a $2 billion deal with the saudis when he left his job in the white house? or is there some national security implications to what hunter biden is alleged to have done, which makes this case more serious? if it s just the type of profiting off of your family, then if people were serious about this, the house republicans and democrats would pass stricter disclosure laws