Premise of the question, yes, google was Hiding Information from its users, he effectively conceded. It was for their own good. According to feinberg, google didnt want to lead people down pathways that we would not find to be authoritative information. Authoritative information. Youve heard that phrase a lot in the last year. Authoritative information is the opposite of misinformation, or disinformation, or worse, a conspiracy theory. Its really important. All you are allowed to see is authoritative information. Its worth knowing and this and many other cases, what is it . In this case, where did google get the authoritative information . In this case, they got that information from a group led by a noted man of science, the name sounds familiar, he almost singlehandedly stopped all public speculation about the lab leak early in the pandemic. They did this in one swoop by organizing a letter to the land, standing as a known fact, there was no possibility of this virus, the coronavirus
she s open to the idea of disarming police and enforcing corp. uses a waste of money. during her time in builder policy owes administration, she was in charge of contracts for businesses owned by women and minorities. only 5.3% of government spending went toward those businesses when she left, the spending has dropped to 4.9%, even al sharpton took a swipe at wiley saying the goal is to get minority contracts up not down. it s unclear of alexandria cortez was aware of wiley s fail at city hall when she endorsed her, but the progressive push has liftediv wiley into the top three of thee democratic primary. that s important, the first time in new york is using ranked choice voting, where voters list your top five choices, the can candidate get more than 50%,
idea of disarming police and enforcing corp. uses a waste of money. it than their s are pushed toward diversity. during her time in builder policy owes administration, she was in charge of contracts for businesses owned by women and minorities. only 5.3% of government spending went toward those businesses, when she left, the spending has dropped to 4.9%, even al sharpton took a swipe at wiley saying the goal is to get minority contracts up not down. if it s unclear of alexandria are causing a was aware of wiley s fail at city hall when she endorsed her, but the progressive push has lifted wiley into the top three of the democratic primary. that s important, the first time in new york is using ranked choice voting, where voters list your top five choices, the can to get more s than 50%, he is the winner. with 13 candidates, somebody getting 50% is highly unlikely,