has exposed. this i have to say that some of these twitter executives have testified before that these practices didn t occur. so, the new house republican majority that i think just has another line of inquiry for their oversight hearings in a few weeks. ainsley: do you know what gets me? all the doctor said was that lockdowns are harmful for children. we all knew that at the time. we interviewed a million parents and they all said the same thing, my child is not doing as well. then the test scores prove it when you get back. you talk to any teacher who says the same thing that the kids are behind. i mean, that s what happens when you keep your kids out of school for a year. brian: who told them to do it. ainsley: exactly, we want to get to the bottom of that what he was saying was not so outrageous. second thing when jack dorsey sits in front of congress and he is under oath and he says he wasn t doing. this now, he says he wasn t shadow banning, maybe this wasn t semantics.
covid policy take for example dr. jay bhattacharya who argued that covid lockdown would harm children. twitter secretly based him on a trends blacklist which prevented his tweets from trending. are consider the popular right wing talk show host dan bongino who at one point was slapped with a searched back list. thee asked this twitter set the account of conservative activist charlie kirk to do not amplify. now, weiss reporting suggests there is a small secret trove of twitter officials who are involved in making these politically sensitive decisions. as you see there ghani, roth, dorsey and ago gras they refer o it as disability filtering or df. twitter will offer a solution to
dan bongino was put on the search blacklist so nobody could find his post. here is his reaction? please, audience, look me in the face and tell me now all you media clowns and goons and nuts who told me i was the crazy conspiracy theorist, tell me we live in a free country. i wonder how we have a committee to carry this whole thing out? yes, and at the highest levels of the most sensitive cases is a super secret committee which included former ceo jack dorsey. the former safety director writing that if there s misinformation that causes harm we should reduce exposure. here is the problem twitter s liberal staff decided what qualified as misinformation according to its agenda. in the case of that stanford professor, who would argue now that extended lockdowns didn t hurt our kids? trace: we talk about jack dorsey, go ahead, howie. i wanted to say that the phrases they use are so orwellian in these memos, disability filtering.