exact time line. i only know from the press reports of what happened before it came to the directors attention. what i do know is it came to his t last thursday and he acted immediately. and at least again according to press reports it doesn t like like they are going to be reviewed before the election. so the idea that he could have answered these questions that are on everybody s mind is a great hope, it just doesn t look like it is something that could have been accomplished and will not be accomplished. we have to deal regularly as groan ups with uncertainty. and i think it is great for us to speculate and we need to, one of the things we need to do as humans is speculate. i think his job is to be absolutely clear about his position when he says an investigation is complete. it is complete. when it is no longer complete, he should inform the american public that it is no longer complete. that there is something else to look at. is there any reason to believe there is something else
yes. it s dana bash. you talked about the fact that he allowed for speculation, which when you are a week out of an election is the worst thing politically that you can do obviously because it allows her opponents to, you know, say what they think it is, which is of course that she committed a crime. so given the fact that he found this information. he wanted to follow up and make sure it got out there so he wasn t accused of covering it up afterwards. why didn t he get a warrant, get all the agents that he possibly could on this and figure out the answer to the question that he doesn t know the answer to sooner so that there wouldn t be so much of a gray area? go through the documents, find out if they are duplicates or if there is a there there. i got to say i m not aware of the exact time line. i only know from the press reports of what happened before it came to the directors attention. what i do know is it came to his