made the wrong decision four or five years ago and the word that she relates to that the president called the vice president. i apologize for being impolite. but do you remember what she said her father called him. the p word. they have to this development underscored by the directness of those conversations, two men at the highest levels of power in this nation talking without intermediaries or assistance, working on their behalf here with two very different takes on this karen friedman magnify alot. former chief assistant d. a in the manhattan district attorney s office, and david schoen, who was lead counsel for donald trump and his second impeachment. alright let s first take a listen to what pence said just a short time ago. we re evaluating the court s decision . but again, i do want to say that i am pleased that the federal judge, really for the first time in history recognized that the constitution speech and
is that they got in the room, they shut the door, they took a quick poll, and nearly everybody must have been on board. maybe there were one or two holdouts, but they talked about it, convince them, and it was not long before everybody was unanimous. yes, very quick verdict, considering how much evidence was introduced. when you say how much evidence was introduced i think a lot of people, i am not a defense attorney, but we will focus on this idea that it was all circumstantial. they never had the murder weapon, the dna evidence was confusing, did you think of that as just a defense like, a line of argument, or did you also see this case as unusually circumstantial? in the closing, the prosecution side to the jury that circumstantial evidence is just as powerful as direct evidence. and he had to, because that is what is in the jury instructions. what he wanted to say, and what i think that he could have said is that circumstantial evidence is often more powerful than direct eviden
not long before everybody was unanimous. yes, very quick verdict, considering how much evidence was introduced. when you say how much evidence was introduced i think a lot of people, i am not a defense attorney, but we will focus on this idea that it was all circumstantial. they never had the murder weapon, the dna evidence was confusing, did you think of that as just a defense like, a line of argument, or did you also see this case as unusually circumstantial? in the closing, the prosecution side to the jury that circumstantial evidence is just as powerful as direct evidence. and he had to, because that is what is in the jury instructions. what he wanted to say, and what i think that he could have said is that circumstantial evidence is often more powerful than direct evidence. directness is eyewitness testimony. it is inherently unreliable. circumstantial evidence is about people lie, but things do not lie. and the things in this case did not lie. the onstar data, the snapchat vi
taken part in four of those where many of the people around them were just mowed down by the ukrainians because they were trying to run towards those positions. the other one said that it was five assaults that he took part in. remind our viewers, about 50,000 such people the ukrainians say have been brought to the front line by wagner, and many of them already have been killed, captured, or ran away. thank you very much, fred. and incredible to have the opportunity to speak to them, and doing so with as much, you know, care and directness as you possibly can just to try to hear their story as best as you can. fred pleitgen live from kyiv. i want to go to the retired army brigadier mark kimmitt. and the news director and anchor for tv rain, which is an independent russian language television channel that was shut down by the russian government at the start of the war. general kimmitt, these wagner fighters, it s interesting, paul whelan, the american who s been
her honesty and directness matters and it s going to matter to the community. but it s also that, you know, if you were daunte wright, 20 years old, dead, because he had an expired registration or patrick leyola, from grand rapids, shot in the back of the head because the license plate on the car didn t match the car, or sandra bland, who is dead, 28 years old, because apparently she was changing lanes without signaling. these are not criminal justice issues that demand a gun or a taser or a fist. and according to the authorities, the crime here was when the officers showed up. yes. and one of the things i hope police departments emulate from what we have seen in memphis is