Want, and how you want. Responsive design froms to fit any screen, your laptop, tablet, or smartphone prayers. Smartphone. Cspans live coverage of washington and you can search our library whenever and wherever you want. It makes it easy for you to keep an i on what is happening in washington. Coming up next, a debate from liberal activists bill ayers and conservative author Dinesh Dsouza. First, an article in the on mr. To examiner sousa. The fbi about what led to the investigation and the history of fbis history of campaign filing. You can read this on the Washington Examiner website. Examiner. Com. Next, Dinesh Dsouza and bill ayers debating the question, what is so great about america . The debate was held at dartmouth, which in New Hampshire. Is two hours. Good evening and welcome to tonights feature debate between Dinesh Dsouza and the layers. Im a junior at dartmouth and the current editor and cheech of the dartmouth review. Privilege to serve as moderator and introduce you to t
Congress. I made a few suggestions, and i have additional suggestions on how he could do that if he was serious about growing the economy. Drilling and leasing activities on federal lands is another. Educational choice. The reality is the president has a choice. I heard a question of whether he mention the minimum wage. Yes, he did, repeatedly. This president and the white house seems to be waving the white house of surrender. Now thea economy is minimum wage economy. We can do better than that. I think america can do better than that. There are things that he can do with executive action. There are other things he can do. We asked him about reining in regulation from the epa, adopt a repealory budgets, outdated relations. There are things we can do instead of waving the white flag of surrender, declaring this economy to be a minimum wage economy. I think we can do better. Until a few moments ago we were going down a pretty cooperative road. [laughter] let me say that we do not all oil
Would be tossed out without consideration if somebody whose very name violates the First Amendment. Im saying this is discriminatory against believers. [applause] are think here you saying the establishment clause, you are now wanting to reinterpret that come up the toond amendment you want reinterpret that, but the Second Amendment you genuflect in front. The idea that religious people are discriminated against is flatly not true. This is a country that absolutely recognizes your believes and you are allowed to practice them anywhere. What you are not allowed to do is bring them government and have government say this is the correct one. Hold on. There is a difference. Although there was the court in georgia that had the 10 commandments in a statue. Read the 10 commandments and see if that makes any sense for secular democracy. You are saying im allowed to have my religious beliefs in private and not impose them on a public square. You are allowed to have them in the public square. Yo